Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Two-year recall for people with no diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic population-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data to quantify the effect

Olvera-Barrios, Abraham; Rudnicka, Alicja R; Anderson, John; Bolter, Louis; Chambers, Ryan; Warwick, Alasdair N; Welikala, Roshan; Fajtl, Jiri; Barman, Sarah; Remagnino, Paolo; Wu, Yue; Lee, Aaron; Chew, Emily Y; Ferris, Frederick L.; Hingorani, Aroon D; Sofat, Reecha; Egan, Catherine; Tufail, Adnan; Owen, Christopher G

Two-year recall for people with no diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic population-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data to quantify the effect Thumbnail


Authors

Abraham Olvera-Barrios

Alicja R Rudnicka

John Anderson

Louis Bolter

Ryan Chambers

Alasdair N Warwick

Roshan Welikala

Jiri Fajtl

Sarah Barman

Yue Wu

Aaron Lee

Emily Y Chew

Frederick L. Ferris

Aroon D Hingorani

Reecha Sofat

Catherine Egan

Adnan Tufail

Christopher G Owen



Abstract

Background/aims: The English Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP) offers people living with diabetes (PLD) annual screening. Less frequent screening has been advocated among PLD without diabetic retinopathy (DR), but evidence for each ethnic group is limited. We examined the potential effect of biennial versus annual screening on the detection of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) among PLD without DR from a large urban multi-ethnic English DESP. Methods: PLD in North-East London DESP (January 2012 to December 2021) with no DR on two prior consecutive screening visits with up to 8 years of follow-up were examined. Annual STDR and PDR incidence rates, overall and by ethnicity, were quantified. Delays in identification of STDR and PDR events had 2-year screening intervals been used were determined. Findings: Among 82 782 PLD (37% white, 36% South Asian, and 16% black people), there were 1788 incident STDR cases over mean (SD) 4.3 (2.4) years (STDR rate 0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.55 per 100-person-years). STDR incidence rates per 100-person-years by ethnicity were 0.55 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.62) for South Asian, 0.34 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.40) for white, and 0.77 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.90) for black people. Biennial screening would have delayed diagnosis by 1 year for 56.3% (1007/1788) with STDR and 43.6% (45/103) with PDR. Standardised cumulative rates of delayed STDR per 100 000 persons for each ethnic group were 1904 (95% CI 1683 to 2154) for black people, 1276 (95% CI 1153 to 1412) for South Asian people, and 844 (95% CI 745 to 955) for white people. Interpretation: Biennial screening would have delayed detection of some STDR and PDR by 1 year, especially among those of black ethnic origin, leading to healthcare inequalities.

Citation

Olvera-Barrios, A., Rudnicka, A. R., Anderson, J., Bolter, L., Chambers, R., Warwick, A. N., …Owen, C. G. (2023). Two-year recall for people with no diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic population-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data to quantify the effect. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1839-1845. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324097

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 19, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 24, 2023
Publication Date 2023-12
Deposit Date Sep 5, 2023
Publicly Available Date Oct 25, 2023
Journal British Journal of Ophthalmology
Print ISSN 0007-1161
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Pages 1839-1845
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324097
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1729581

Files


Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version) (1 Mb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations