Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Undistorted, Un(fair) Competition, Consumer Welfare and the Interpretation of Article 102 TFEU

Chirita, Anca Daniela

Undistorted, Un(fair) Competition, Consumer Welfare and the Interpretation of Article 102 TFEU Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

This article explains the Lisbon Treaty’s provisions relating to competition policy and offers a dynamic interpretation of Article 102 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which could justify the consideration of an effects-based approach to those anti-competitive practices that are most harmful to the final consumers under the economic theory of consumer welfare. The implications of ‘consumerprotection requirements’ must shed special light on Article 12 TFEU. Therefore, this article examines the possibility of shifting the courts’ teleological interpretation of Article 102, which is based on Protocol 27’s ‘undistorted competition’, towards a legal balancing test of the Treaty’s objectives. It also highlights the interpretation of undistorted competition within the internal market and the interplay between EU ‘free’ and fair and unfair competition rules. The balance of EU competition law should, therefore, be performed between Article 119 TFEU’s free competition or economic freedom-based competition and Article 12 as ensuring a ‘high level of protection’, as embedded in the Treaty, for the final consumers. This article explains how consumer-protection requirements must be defined narrowly so that Article 12 may be applied to Article 102. Article 12 can, therefore, mandate a high level of consumer protection for the final consumers in implementing such a specific policy as the abuse of dominance.

Citation

Chirita, A. D. (2010). Undistorted, Un(fair) Competition, Consumer Welfare and the Interpretation of Article 102 TFEU. World Competition, 33(3), 417-436

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2010
Deposit Date Sep 7, 2011
Publicly Available Date Oct 19, 2016
Journal World competition law and economics review.
Print ISSN 1011-4548
Publisher Kluwer Law International
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 3
Pages 417-436
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1505534
Publisher URL http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=WOCO2010036

Files

Published Journal Article (139 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Reprinted from World competition law and economics review., 33(3), 2010, 417-436 with permission of Kluwer Law International.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations