Blending bias impacts the host halo masses derived from a cross-correlation analysis of bright submillimetre galaxies

Cowley, W.I.; Lacey, C.G.; Baugh, C.M.; Cole, S.; Wilkinson, A.

Abstract

Placing bright submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) within the broader context of galaxy formation and evolution requires accurate measurements of their clustering, which can constrain the masses of their host dark matter haloes. Recent work has shown that the clustering measurements of these galaxies may be affected by a ‘blending bias’, which results in the angular correlation function of the sources extracted from single-dish imaging surveys being boosted relative to that of the underlying galaxies. This is due to confusion introduced by the coarse angular resolution of the single-dish telescope and could lead to the inferred halo masses being significantly overestimated. We investigate the extent to which this bias affects the measurement of the correlation function of SMGs when it is derived via a cross-correlation with a more abundant galaxy population. We find that the blending bias is essentially the same as in the autocorrelation case and conclude that the best way to reduce its effects is to calculate the angular correlation function using SMGs in narrow redshift bins. Blending bias causes the inferred host halo masses of the SMGs to be overestimated by a factor of ∼6 when a redshift interval of δz = 3 is used. However, this reduces to a factor of ∼2 for δz = 0.5. The broadening of photometric redshift probability distributions with increasing redshift can therefore impart a mild halo ‘downsizing’ effect on to the inferred host halo masses, though this trend is not as strong as seen in recent observational studies

Citation

Cowley, W., Lacey, C., Baugh, C., Cole, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2017). Blending bias impacts the host halo masses derived from a cross-correlation analysis of bright submillimetre galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469(3), 3396-3404. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx928

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Apr 13, 2017
• Online Publication Date: Apr 19, 2017
• Publication Date: Apr 19, 2017
• Deposit Date: Jul 18, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 18, 2017
• Journal: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
• Print ISSN: 0035-8711
• Electronic ISSN: 1365-2966
• Publisher: Royal Astronomical Society
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 469
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 3396-3404
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx928
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1354845