A Smith
Generating mock galaxy catalogues for flux-limited samples like the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey
Smith, A; Grove, C; Cole, S; Norberg, P; Zarrouk, P; Yuan, S; Aguilar, J; Ahlen, S; Brooks, D; Claybaugh, T; de la Macorra, A; Doel, P; Forero-Romero, J E; Gaztañaga, E; Gontcho, S Gontcho A; Hahn, C; Kehoe, R; Kremin, A; Levi, M E; Manera, M; Meisner, A; Miquel, R; Moustakas, J; Nie, J; Percival, W J; Rezaie, M; Rossi, G; Sanchez, E; Seo, H; Tarlé, G; Zhou, Z
Authors
Cameron Grove cameron.grove@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Professor Shaun Cole shaun.cole@durham.ac.uk
Director of the Institute for Computational Cosmology
Professor Peder Norberg peder.norberg@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Dr Pauline Zarrouk pauline.s.zarrouk@durham.ac.uk
Academic Visitor
S Yuan
J Aguilar
S Ahlen
D Brooks
T Claybaugh
A de la Macorra
P Doel
J E Forero-Romero
E Gaztañaga
S Gontcho A Gontcho
C Hahn
R Kehoe
A Kremin
M E Levi
M Manera
A Meisner
R Miquel
J Moustakas
J Nie
W J Percival
M Rezaie
G Rossi
E Sanchez
H Seo
G Tarlé
Z Zhou
Abstract
Accurate mock galaxy catalogues are crucial to validate analysis pipelines used to constrain dark energy models. We present a fast HOD-fitting method which we apply to the AbacusSummit simulations to create a set of mock catalogues for the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey, which contain r-band magnitudes and (g − r) colours. The halo tabulation method fits HODs for different absolute magnitude threshold samples simultaneously, preventing unphysical HOD crossing between samples. We validate the HOD fitting procedure by fitting to real-space clustering measurements and galaxy number densities from the MXXL BGS mock, which was tuned to the SDSS and GAMA surveys. The best-fitting clustering measurements and number densities are mostly within the assumed errors, but the clustering for the faint samples is low on large scales. The best-fitting HOD parameters are robust when fitting to simulations with different realizations of the initial conditions. When varying the cosmology, trends are seen as a function of each cosmological parameter. We use the best-fitting HOD parameters to create cubic box and cut sky mocks from the AbacusSummit simulations, in a range of cosmologies. As an illustration, we compare the 0.1Mr < −20 sample of galaxies in the mock with BGS measurements from the DESI one-percent survey. We find good agreement in the number densities, and the projected correlation function is reasonable, with differences that can be improved in the future by fitting directly to BGS clustering measurements. The cubic box and cut-sky mocks in different cosmologies are made publicly available.
Citation
Smith, A., Grove, C., Cole, S., Norberg, P., Zarrouk, P., Yuan, S., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., Brooks, D., Claybaugh, T., de la Macorra, A., Doel, P., Forero-Romero, J. E., Gaztañaga, E., Gontcho, S. G. A., Hahn, C., Kehoe, R., Kremin, A., Levi, M. E., Manera, M., …Zhou, Z. (2024). Generating mock galaxy catalogues for flux-limited samples like the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 532(1), 903-919. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1503
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 12, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 17, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-07 |
Deposit Date | Aug 1, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 1, 2024 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Print ISSN | 0035-8711 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2966 |
Publisher | Royal Astronomical Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 532 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 903-919 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1503 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2673909 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(8.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
PROVABGS: The Probabilistic Stellar Mass Function of the BGS One-percent Survey
(2024)
Journal Article
DESI mock challenge: constructing DESI galaxy catalogues based on FastPM simulations
(2023)
Journal Article
The two-point correlation function covariance with fewer mocks
(2023)
Journal Article