Dr Jia Wang jia.wang2@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
The gap between video games and copyright, an intellectual property (IP) right, is that the doctrinal copyright theories cannot explain the nature of the gameplay and game rules. The lack of a theoretical framework addressing the gameplay comprising abstract ideas and specific expressions has caused much confusion and uncertainty in the games industry and among legal practitioners across jurisdictions. This article explores whether the gameplay, a core value of the game, should be protected by copyright, patent or not protected at all. It employs a novel analytical framework based on Hunicke et al.’s theory of mechanic–dynamics–aesthetics, a game-designing theory, to analyse the IP legal nature of the gameplay and game rules. Based on the proposed analytical framework, it conducts a case study of three representative games, from aesthetics to mechanics, to demonstrate that dynamics as the game system consists of expressions of the game designer. Considering the cross-border nature of the development and trade of video games, this article undertakes a comparative study of IP law in the United Kingdom and China. It concludes that dynamics as the game system is expressive and can be protected by copyright.
Wang, J. (2023). Intellectual property protection for video games: A MDA framework-based analysis. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 15(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00079_1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 25, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 30, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2023-06 |
Deposit Date | Feb 20, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds |
Print ISSN | 1757-191X |
Electronic ISSN | 1757-1928 |
Publisher | Intellect |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 15 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 177-194 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00079_1 |
Keywords | Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design; Computer Science Applications; Human-Computer Interaction |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2270140 |
Legal Nature of NFTed Artwork: A Comparative Study
(2024)
Book Chapter
Legal Nature of NFTed Artwork -- A Comparative Study.
(2023)
Book Chapter
Reconceptualizing the interface of copyright and design rights for 3D printing
(2022)
Journal Article
Punitive Damages Under the New Chinese Civil Code – A Critical and Comparative Analysis
(2021)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search