Amit Bhave
Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets
Bhave, Amit; Taylor, Richard H.S.; Fennell, Paul; Livingston, William R.; Shah, Nilay; Mac Dowell, Niall; Dennis, John; Kraft, Markus; Pourkashanian, Mohammed; Insa, Mathieu; Jones, Jenny; Burdett, Nigel; Bauen, Ausilio; Beal, Corinne; Smallbone, Andrew; Akroyd, Jethro
Authors
Richard H.S. Taylor
Paul Fennell
William R. Livingston
Nilay Shah
Niall Mac Dowell
John Dennis
Markus Kraft
Mohammed Pourkashanian
Mathieu Insa
Jenny Jones
Nigel Burdett
Ausilio Bauen
Corinne Beal
Professor Andrew Smallbone andrew.smallbone@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Jethro Akroyd
Abstract
Biomass-based power generation combined with CO2 capture and storage (Biopower CCS) currently represents one of the few practical and economic means of removing large quantities of CO2 from the atmosphere, and the only approach that involves the generation of electricity at the same time. We present the results of the Techno-Economic Study of Biomass to Power with CO2 capture (TESBiC) project, that entailed desk-based review and analysis, process engineering, optimisation as well as primary data collection from some of the leading pilot demonstration plants. From the perspective of being able to deploy Biopower CCS by 2050, twenty-eight Biopower CCS technology combinations involving combustion or gasification of biomass (either dedicated or co-fired with coal) together with pre-, oxy- or post-combustion CO2 capture were identified and assessed. In addition to the capital and operating costs, techno-economic characteristics such as electrical efficiencies (LHV% basis), Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE), costs of CO2 captured and CO2 avoided were modelled over time assuming technology improvements from today to 2050. Many of the Biopower CCS technologies gave relatively similar techno-economic results when analysed at the same scale, with the plant scale (MWe) observed to be the principal driver of CAPEX (£/MWe) and the cofiring % (i.e. the weighted feedstock cost) a key driver of LCOE. The data collected during the TESBiC project also highlighted the lack of financial incentives for generation of electricity with negative CO2 emissions.
Citation
Bhave, A., Taylor, R. H., Fennell, P., Livingston, W. R., Shah, N., Mac Dowell, N., …Akroyd, J. (2017). Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets. Applied Energy, 190, 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.120
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 26, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 7, 2017 |
Publication Date | Mar 31, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 8, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 24, 2019 |
Journal | Applied Energy |
Print ISSN | 0306-2619 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 190 |
Pages | 481-489 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.120 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1318926 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(353 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2017 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Research and innovation identified to decarbonise the maritime sector
(2024)
Journal Article
Industrial cluster energy systems integration and management tool
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search