Kobié H. Toé
Assessing the impact of the addition of pyriproxyfen on the durability of permethrin-treated bed nets in Burkina Faso: a compound-randomized controlled trial
Toé, Kobié H.; Mechan, Frank; Tangena, Julie-Anne A.; Morris, Marion; Solino, Joanna; Tchicaya, Emile F.S.; Traoré, Alphonse; Ismail, Hanafy; Maas, James; Lissenden, Natalie; Pinder, Margaret; Lindsay, Steve W.; Tiono, Alfred B.; Ranson, Hilary; Sagnon, N’Falé
Authors
Frank Mechan
Julie-Anne A. Tangena
Marion Morris
Joanna Solino
Emile F.S. Tchicaya
Alphonse Traoré
Hanafy Ismail
James Maas
Natalie Lissenden
Margaret Pinder
Professor Steve Lindsay s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Alfred B. Tiono
Hilary Ranson
N’Falé Sagnon
Abstract
Background Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) treated with pyrethroids are the foundation of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. Rising pyrethroid resistance in vectors, however, has driven the development of alternative net formulations. Here the durability of polyethylene nets with a novel combination of a pyrethroid, permethrin, and the insect juvenile hormone mimic, pyriproxyfen (PPF), compared to a standard permethrin LLIN, was assessed in rural Burkina Faso. Methods A compound-randomized controlled trial was completed in two villages. In one village 326 of the PPF-permethrin nets (Olyset Duo) and 327 standard LLINs (Olyset) were distributed to assess bioefficacy. In a second village, 170 PPF-permethrin nets and 376 LLINs were distributed to assess survivorship. Nets were followed at 6-monthly intervals for 3 years. Bioefficacy was assessed by exposing permethrin-susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquito strains to standard World Health Organization (WHO) cone and tunnel tests with impacts on fertility measured in the resistant strain. Insecticide content was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. LLIN survivorship was recorded with a questionnaire and assessed by comparing the physical integrity using the proportionate hole index (pHI). Results The PPF-permethrin net met WHO bioefficacy criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) for the first 18 months, compared to 6 months for the standard LLIN. Mean mosquito mortality for PPF-permethrin nets, across all time points, was 8.6% (CI 2.6–14.6%) higher than the standard LLIN. Fertility rates were reduced after PPF-permethrin net exposure at 1-month post distribution, but not later. Permethrin content of both types of nets remained within the target range of 20 g/kg ± 25% for 242/248 nets tested. The pyriproxyfen content of PPF-permethrin nets declined by 54%, from 10.4 g/kg (CI 10.2–10.6) to 4.7 g/kg (CI 3.5–6.0, p < 0.001) over 36 months. Net survivorship was poor, with only 13% of PPF-permethrin nets and 12% of LLINs still present in the original household after 36 months. There was no difference in the fabric integrity or survivorship between the two net types. Conclusion The PPF-permethrin net, Olyset Duo, met or exceeded the performance of the WHO-recommended standard LLIN (Olyset) in the current study but both net types failed the 3-year WHO bioefficacy criteria.
Citation
Toé, K. H., Mechan, F., Tangena, J.-A. A., Morris, M., Solino, J., Tchicaya, E. F., Traoré, A., Ismail, H., Maas, J., Lissenden, N., Pinder, M., Lindsay, S. W., Tiono, A. B., Ranson, H., & Sagnon, N. (2019). Assessing the impact of the addition of pyriproxyfen on the durability of permethrin-treated bed nets in Burkina Faso: a compound-randomized controlled trial. Malaria Journal, 18, Article 383. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3018-1
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 20, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 2, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2019 |
Deposit Date | Mar 24, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 24, 2021 |
Journal | Malaria Journal |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 18 |
Article Number | 383 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3018-1 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1278400 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search