Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca
The effect of physical barriers under a raised house on mosquito entry: an experimental study in rural Gambia
Carrasco-Tenezaca, Majo; Jawara, Musa; Bradley, John; D’Alessandro, Umberto; Jeffries, David; Knudsen, Jakob B.; Lindsay, Steve W.
Authors
Musa Jawara
John Bradley
Umberto D’Alessandro
David Jeffries
Jakob B. Knudsen
Professor Steve Lindsay s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Background: Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria mosquito in sub-Saharan Africa, feed largely indoors at night. Raising a house off the ground with no barriers underneath reduces mosquito-house entry. This experiment tested whether walling off the space under an elevated hut affects mosquito-hut entry. Methods: Four inhabited experimental huts, each of which could be moved up and down, were used in rural Gambia. Nightly collections of mosquitoes were made using light traps and temperature and carbon dioxide levels monitored indoors and outdoors using loggers. Each night, a reference hut was kept at ground level and three huts raised 2 m above the ground; with the space under the hut left open, walled with air-permeable walls or solid walls. Treatments were rotated every four nights using a randomized block design. The experiment was conducted for 32 nights. Primary measurements were mosquito numbers and indoor temperature in each hut. Results: A total of 1,259 female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato were collected in the hut at ground level, 655 in the hut with an open ground floor, 981 in the hut with air-permeable walls underneath and 873 in the hut with solid walls underneath. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for confounders, showed that a raised hut open underneath had 53% fewer mosquitoes (95% CI 47–58%), those with air-permeable walls underneath 24% fewer (95% CI 9–36%) and huts with solid walls underneath 31% fewer (95% CI 24–37%) compared with a hut on the ground. Similar results were found for Mansonia spp. and total number of female mosquitoes, but not for Culex mosquitoes where hut entry was unaffected by height or barriers. Indoor temperature and carbon dioxide levels were similar in all huts. Conclusion: Raising a house 2 m from the ground reduces the entry of An. gambiae and Mansonia mosquitoes, but not Culex species. The protective effect of height is reduced if the space underneath the hut is walled off.
Citation
Carrasco-Tenezaca, M., Jawara, M., Bradley, J., D’Alessandro, U., Jeffries, D., Knudsen, J. B., & Lindsay, S. W. (2024). The effect of physical barriers under a raised house on mosquito entry: an experimental study in rural Gambia. Malaria Journal, 23, Article 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-04889-z
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 21, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 8, 2024 |
Publication Date | Apr 8, 2024 |
Deposit Date | May 13, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 13, 2024 |
Journal | Malaria Journal |
Electronic ISSN | 1475-2875 |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 23 |
Article Number | 100 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-04889-z |
Keywords | Housing, Sub-Saharan Africa, Malaria, Mosquitoes, Anopheles gambiae |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2383848 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search