Dr Jessica Begon jessica.e.begon@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
The suggestion that individuals should be considered disadvantaged, and consequently entitled to compensation, only if they consider themselves disadvantaged (Dworkin’s ‘continuity test’) is initially appealing. However, it also faces problems. First, if individuals are routinely mistaken, then we routinely fail to assist the deserving. Second, if individuals assess their circumstances differently then the state will provide different levels of assistance to people in identical situations. Thus, should we instead ignore individuals’ convictions and provide assistance that some, at least, do not feel they need? One set of cases where this dilemma is salient are those in which disabled individuals disagree over whether they are disadvantaged. Focussing on these, I argue that despite objections, individuals should have a voice in determining whether they are disadvantaged. However, I contend that our goal should not be ensuring continuity with individuals’ ethical convictions (concerning the pursuits they deem worthwhile or valuable), but their convictions regarding whether they are relevantly disadvantaged (whether they have what they are entitled to).
Begon, J. (2024). Disadvantage, Disagreement, and Disability: Re-evaluating the Continuity Test. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 27(5), 684-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1972585
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 18, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 14, 2021 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Sep 3, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 10, 2022 |
Journal | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy |
Print ISSN | 1369-8230 |
Electronic ISSN | 1743-8772 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 684-713 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1972585 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1235848 |
Published Journal Article
(757 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Published Journal Article
(762 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Disability Through the Lens of Justice
(2023)
Book
Disability: a justice-based account
(2020)
Journal Article
Sexual Perversion: A Liberal Account
(2019)
Journal Article
Disability, Rationality, and Justice: Disambiguating Adaptive Preferences
(2018)
Book Chapter
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search