Foreword
(2010)
Book Chapter
Cartwright, N. (2010). Foreword. In J. Woods (Ed.), Fictions and Models: New Essays. Philosophia Verlag
All Outputs (12)
Models: Parables v Fables (2010)
Book Chapter
Cartwright, N. D. (2010). Models: Parables v Fables. In R. Frigg, & M. Hunter (Eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention Representation In Art and Science (19-31). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_2
Natural Laws and the Closure of Physics. (2010)
Book Chapter
Cartwright, N. (2010). Natural Laws and the Closure of Physics. In R. Chiao, A. Leggett, M. Cohen, & C. Harper (Eds.), Visions of Discovery. New Light on Physics, Cosmology and Consciousness (612-622). Cambridge University Press
Relativism in the Philosophy of Science. (2010)
Book Chapter
Cartwright, N. (2010). Relativism in the Philosophy of Science. In M. Krausz (Ed.), Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology (86-99). Columbia University Press
Does Roush show that evidence should be probable? (2010)
Journal Article
Fennell, D., & Cartwright, N. (2010). Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?. Synthese, 175(3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9510-3This paper critically analyzes Sherrilyn Roush’s (Tracking truth: knowledge, evidence and science, 2005) definition of evidence and especially her powerful defence that in the ideal, a claim should be probable to be evidence for anything. We suggest... Read More about Does Roush show that evidence should be probable?.
Comments on Longworth and Weber (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N. (2010). Comments on Longworth and Weber. Analysis, 70(2), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp158As Francis Longworth discusses, HC&UT argues that there is no such thing as the causal relation nor a handful of causal relations and not even a truckload. Rather, there is only a seemingly endless array of relations, called ‘thick’ relations in the... Read More about Comments on Longworth and Weber.
The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N., & Munro, E. (2010). The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.xWhat kinds of evidence reliably support predictions of effectiveness for health and social care interventions? There is increasing reliance, not only for health care policy and practice but also for more general social and economic policy deliberatio... Read More about The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness.
Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N. (2010). Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Analysis, 70(2), 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp157Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics (HC&UT) is about notions of causality appropriate to the sciences, mostly generic causal claims (causal laws) and especially notions that connect causality with probability.1 Most... Read More about Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics.
Reply to Steel and Pearl: Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N. (2010). Reply to Steel and Pearl: Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Economics and Philosophy, 26(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267110000088
Evidence-Based Policy: Where Is Our Theory of Evidence? (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N., Goldfinch, A., & Howick, J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policy: Where Is Our Theory of Evidence?. Journal of Children's Services, 4(4), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2010.0017This article critically analyses the concept of evidence in evidence‐based policy, arguing that there is a key problem: there is no existing practicable theory of evidence, one which is philosophically‐grounded and yet applicable for evidence‐based p... Read More about Evidence-Based Policy: Where Is Our Theory of Evidence?.
What are randomised controlled trials good for? (2010)
Journal Article
Cartwright, N. (2010). What are randomised controlled trials good for?. Philosophical Studies, 147(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9450-2Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are widely taken as the gold standard for establishing causal conclusions. Ideally conducted they ensure that the treatment ‘causes’ the outcome—in the experiment. But where else? This is the venerable question of... Read More about What are randomised controlled trials good for?.
Measuring the Impact of Philosophy (2010)
Digital Artefact
Bovens, L., & Cartwright, N. (2010). Measuring the Impact of Philosophy. [II]The question of concern for this inquiry is “what evidence is there on the feasibility or effectiveness of estimating the economic impact of research” in this field? There is a current tendency to think that evidence consists only in empirical studie... Read More about Measuring the Impact of Philosophy.