Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Mitigating bias in long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic studies

Jarrett, David; Barnett, Ross; Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom; Froidevaux, Jérémy S. P.; Gibb, Kieran; Guinet, Pauline; Greenhalgh, Jack; Heath, Becky; Johnston, Alison; Monfort, José Joaquín Lahoz; Rogers, Alex; Willis, Stephen G.; Metcalf, Oliver

Mitigating bias in long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic studies Thumbnail


Authors

David Jarrett david.jarrett@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy

Ross Barnett

Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence

Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux

Kieran Gibb

Pauline Guinet

Jack Greenhalgh

Becky Heath

Alison Johnston

José Joaquín Lahoz Monfort

Alex Rogers

Oliver Metcalf



Abstract

Long‐term biodiversity monitoring is needed to track progress towards ambitious global targets to reduce species loss and restore ecosystems. The recent development of cheap and robust acoustic recording devices offers a cost‐effective means of gathering standardised long‐term datasets. Accounting for sources of bias in ecological monitoring and research is a fundamental part of the study design process. To highlight this issue in the context of long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic monitoring, here we collate and discuss sources of bias arising from (i) hardware devices, (ii) firmware, software and analysis tools and (iii) the deployment environment. One important source of bias is unavoidable changes in recording hardware—to demonstrate how this potentially introduces bias, we present two case studies comparing the output from simultaneous recordings from different recorders. To mitigate biases, we recommend effective documentation of environmental and hardware‐related variables, as well as a long‐term data storage strategy that facilitates reanalysis. Additionally, the use of regular calibration tests to measure variation in the acoustic detection space will facilitate analytical approaches or post‐hoc AI solutions that remove unwanted biases. Synthesis and applications: The sources of bias and suggested mitigations described here will be of relevance to hardware manufacturers, ecological researchers and conservation practitioners. Researchers and conservation practitioners must be fully aware of relevant biases when designing long‐term ecoacoustic studies and should incorporate appropriate mitigations into their study design.

Citation

Jarrett, D., Barnett, R., Bradfer‐Lawrence, T., Froidevaux, J. S. P., Gibb, K., Guinet, P., Greenhalgh, J., Heath, B., Johnston, A., Monfort, J. J. L., Rogers, A., Willis, S. G., & Metcalf, O. (online). Mitigating bias in long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic studies. Journal of Applied Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70000

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 22, 2024
Online Publication Date Feb 14, 2025
Deposit Date Mar 14, 2025
Publicly Available Date Mar 14, 2025
Journal Journal of Applied Ecology
Print ISSN 0021-8901
Electronic ISSN 1365-2664
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70000
Keywords bias, passive acoustics, bioacoustics, ecoacoustics, acoustic indices, biodiversity, monitoring
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3487573

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations