David Jarrett david.jarrett@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Mitigating bias in long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic studies
Jarrett, David; Barnett, Ross; Bradfer‐Lawrence, Tom; Froidevaux, Jérémy S. P.; Gibb, Kieran; Guinet, Pauline; Greenhalgh, Jack; Heath, Becky; Johnston, Alison; Monfort, José Joaquín Lahoz; Rogers, Alex; Willis, Stephen G.; Metcalf, Oliver
Authors
Ross Barnett
Tom Bradfer‐Lawrence
Jérémy S. P. Froidevaux
Kieran Gibb
Pauline Guinet
Jack Greenhalgh
Becky Heath
Alison Johnston
José Joaquín Lahoz Monfort
Alex Rogers
Professor Stephen Willis s.g.willis@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Oliver Metcalf
Abstract
Long‐term biodiversity monitoring is needed to track progress towards ambitious global targets to reduce species loss and restore ecosystems. The recent development of cheap and robust acoustic recording devices offers a cost‐effective means of gathering standardised long‐term datasets. Accounting for sources of bias in ecological monitoring and research is a fundamental part of the study design process. To highlight this issue in the context of long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic monitoring, here we collate and discuss sources of bias arising from (i) hardware devices, (ii) firmware, software and analysis tools and (iii) the deployment environment. One important source of bias is unavoidable changes in recording hardware—to demonstrate how this potentially introduces bias, we present two case studies comparing the output from simultaneous recordings from different recorders. To mitigate biases, we recommend effective documentation of environmental and hardware‐related variables, as well as a long‐term data storage strategy that facilitates reanalysis. Additionally, the use of regular calibration tests to measure variation in the acoustic detection space will facilitate analytical approaches or post‐hoc AI solutions that remove unwanted biases. Synthesis and applications: The sources of bias and suggested mitigations described here will be of relevance to hardware manufacturers, ecological researchers and conservation practitioners. Researchers and conservation practitioners must be fully aware of relevant biases when designing long‐term ecoacoustic studies and should incorporate appropriate mitigations into their study design.
Citation
Jarrett, D., Barnett, R., Bradfer‐Lawrence, T., Froidevaux, J. S. P., Gibb, K., Guinet, P., Greenhalgh, J., Heath, B., Johnston, A., Monfort, J. J. L., Rogers, A., Willis, S. G., & Metcalf, O. (online). Mitigating bias in long‐term terrestrial ecoacoustic studies. Journal of Applied Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70000
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 22, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 14, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Mar 14, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 14, 2025 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Ecology |
Print ISSN | 0021-8901 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2664 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70000 |
Keywords | bias, passive acoustics, bioacoustics, ecoacoustics, acoustic indices, biodiversity, monitoring |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3487573 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version)
(929 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Monitoring wader breeding productivity
(2023)
Journal Article
Exploring novel North Water Polynya ecosystems under climate change
(2024)
Journal Article