Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The ritual stance and the precaution system: the role of goal-demotion and opacity in ritual and everyday actions

Kapitány, Rohan; Nielsen, Mark

Authors

Mark Nielsen



Abstract

Rituals tend to be both causally opaque and goal demoted, yet these two qualities are rarely dissociated in the literature. Here we manipulate both factors and demonstrate their unique influence on ritual cognition. In a 2 × 3 (action type x goal information) between subjects design 484 US adults viewed causally opaque (ritual) or causally transparent (ordinary) actions performed on identical objects. They were provided with no goal information, positive goal information (“Blessing”) or negative goal information (“Cursing”). Neither causal opacity nor goal information influenced perceptions of physical change/causation. In contrast, causal opacity increased attributions of “specialness,” whereas goal information did not. Finally, goal information interacted with action type on measures of preference, such that ordinary actions are influenced by both “blessings” and “curses,” but ritual actions are only influenced by “curses.” These findings are interpreted in light of the Ritual Stance, and the cognitive bases of the effects are described with reference to Boyer and Liénard's hazard-precaution theory of ritualized behavior. The combined value of these two theories is discussed, and extended to a causal model of developmental ritual “calibration.”

Citation

Kapitány, R., & Nielsen, M. (2017). The ritual stance and the precaution system: the role of goal-demotion and opacity in ritual and everyday actions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2016.1141792

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 1, 2015
Online Publication Date Mar 11, 2016
Publication Date Jan 2, 2017
Deposit Date Aug 20, 2024
Journal Religion, Brain & Behavior
Print ISSN 2153-599X
Electronic ISSN 2153-5981
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue 1
Pages 27-42
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2016.1141792
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2762194
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rrbb20