Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights

Allen, Tom

Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

In most of Europe, expropriation must comply with the standards set under European human rights law. Article 1 of the First Protocol (‘P1-1’) to the European Convention on Human Rights declares that ‘every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.’ The European Court of Human Rights has stated that the right would be ‘largely illusory and ineffective’ if it did not guarantee full compensation in all but exceptional circumstances. It is quite clear, however, that this was not the belief of at least some of the States that had signed it when it came into force in 1954. P1-1 makes no reference to compensation. An interference must be lawful, and in the public or general interest, but there is nothing that expressly requires compensation. Nevertheless, the Court has declared that any interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a ‘‘fair balance’ between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights’, and this means that expropriation without compensation that is reasonably related to the value of the property would normally violate the owner's rights under P1-1.

Citation

Allen, T. (2010). Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(4), 1055-1078. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589310000448

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2010
Deposit Date Nov 21, 2011
Publicly Available Date Sep 12, 2012
Journal International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Print ISSN 0020-5893
Electronic ISSN 1471-6895
Publisher British Institute of International and Comparative Law
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 59
Issue 4
Pages 1055-1078
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589310000448
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1534153

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations