Professor Peter Vickers peter.vickers@durham.ac.uk
Head of Department
The philosopher of science faces overwhelming disagreement in the literature on the definition, nature, structure, ontology, and content of scientific theories. These disagreements are at least partly responsible for disagreements in many of the debates in the discipline which put weight on the concept *scientific theory*. I argue that available theories of theories and conceptual analyses of *theory* are ineffectual options for addressing this difficulty: they do not move debates forward in a significant way. Directing my attention to debates about the properties of particular, named theories, I introduce ‘theory eliminativism’ as a certain type of debate-reformulation. As a methodological tool it has the potential to be a highly effective way to make progress in the face of the noted problem: post-reformulation disagreements about *theory* cannot compromise the debate, and the questions that really matter can still be asked and answered. In addition the reformulation process demands that philosophers engage with science and the history of science in a more serious way than is usual in order to answer important questions about the justification for targeting a particular set of propositions (say) in a given context. All things considered, we should expect the benefits of a theory-eliminating debate-reformulation to heavily outweigh the costs for a highly significant number of debates of the relevant type.
Vickers, P. (2014). Scientific Theory Eliminativism. Erkenntnis, 79(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 2, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 11, 2013 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Mar 19, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 14, 2014 |
Journal | Erkenntnis |
Print ISSN | 0165-0106 |
Electronic ISSN | 1572-8420 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 79 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 111-126 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1486978 |
Accepted Journal Article
(324 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2.
Surveys of the scientific community on the existence of extraterrestrial life
(2025)
Journal Article
The Call for a New Definition of Biosignature.
(2023)
Journal Article
Don’t we all believe in scientific facts? Replies to my critics
(2023)
Journal Article
Breakthrough results in astrobiology: is ‘high risk’ research needed?
(2023)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search