Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement

Vickers, Peter; Adamo, Ludovica; Alfano, Mark; Clark, Cory; Cresto, Eleonora; Cui, He; Dang, Haixin; Dellsén, Finnur; Dupin, Nathalie; Gradowski, Laura; Graf, Simon; Guevara, Aline; Hallap, Mark; Hamilton, Jesse; Hardey, Mariann; Helm, Paula; Landrum, Asheley; Levy, Neil; Machery, Edouard; Mills, Sarah; Muller, Seán; Sheppard, Joanne; N. K., Shinod; Slater, Matthew; Stegenga, Jacob; Strandin, Henning; Stuart, Mike T.; Sweet, David; Tasdan, Ufuk; Taylor, Henry; Towler, Owen; Tulodziecki, Dana; Tworek, Heidi; Wallbank, Rebecca; Wiltsche, Harald; Mitchell Finnigan, Samantha

Authors

Ludovica Adamo

Mark Alfano

Cory Clark

Eleonora Cresto

He Cui he.cui@durham.ac.uk
Combined Role

Haixin Dang

Finnur Dellsén

Nathalie Dupin

Laura Gradowski

Simon Graf

Aline Guevara

Mark Hallap

Jesse Hamilton

Paula Helm

Asheley Landrum

Neil Levy

Edouard Machery

Sarah Mills

Seán Muller

Shinod N. K.

Matthew Slater

Jacob Stegenga

Henning Strandin

Mike T. Stuart

David Sweet

Henry Taylor

Owen Towler

Dana Tulodziecki

Heidi Tworek

Rebecca Wallbank

Harald Wiltsche



Abstract

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

Citation

Vickers, P., Adamo, L., Alfano, M., Clark, C., Cresto, E., Cui, H., Dang, H., Dellsén, F., Dupin, N., Gradowski, L., Graf, S., Guevara, A., Hallap, M., Hamilton, J., Hardey, M., Helm, P., Landrum, A., Levy, N., Machery, E., Mills, S., …Mitchell Finnigan, S. (2024). Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement. PLoS ONE, 19(12), Article e0313541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 27, 2024
Online Publication Date Dec 6, 2024
Publication Date Dec 6, 2024
Deposit Date Oct 31, 2024
Journal PLOS ONE
Electronic ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 19
Issue 12
Article Number e0313541
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2994669