Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy

Brooks, Thom



Robert B. Talisse's A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy is a genuine tour de force. His aim is both to defend a particular view of pragmatism originating with the work of Charles Sanders Peirce and, at the same time, argue in favour of a new view of deliberative democracy developed from Talisse's Peircean pragmatism. The result is a stunning achievement with real persuasive power. In this article, I will focus on one worry, namely, that the picture of democracy on offer is incomplete. While Talisse correctly argues that democracy is about more than elections, democracy is also about more than deliberation between citizens. Talisse's deliberative democracy is problematic to the degree its view of deliberation fails to account for democracy. If my analysis is correct, then I do not aim to demonstrate that Talisse's Peircean pragmatism is incorrect, only incomplete. Thus, the hope of this article is to help develop this pragmatism further.


Brooks, T. (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2009
Deposit Date Nov 21, 2012
Journal Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 45
Issue 1
Pages 50-54
Publisher URL

You might also like

Downloadable Citations