M.N.K. Saunders
Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?
Saunders, M.N.K.; Dietz, G.; Thornhill, A.
Authors
G. Dietz
A. Thornhill
Abstract
This article provides an empirical test of whether trust and distrust can co-exist in the mind of an employee. Two interrelated questions are considered: firstly, whether trust and distrust judgements are ‘symmetrical’ or whether they can occur ‘simultaneously’ as separate constructs; and, secondly, whether trust and distrust judgements entail the same or conceptually different expectations as revealed in their expressions and anticipated manifestations. Using a concurrent mixed-method design incorporating a structured card sort and in-depth interviews, data were collected from 56 participants in two organizations. The card-sort findings offer little support for the co-existence of trust and distrust, but suggest they could be separate constructs. Interview data indicate that participants do perceive trust and distrust as entailing different sets of expectations and having different manifestations, providing some support for the ‘separate constructs’ thesis. We also find evidence of two new combinations of weak levels of trust and distrust not previously specified. The findings highlight how employees’ trust and distrust judgements are shaped, in part, by managerial actions and policies relating to quality of communication and job security. They also emphasize how, when employees are distrustful, different practice interventions may be needed to reduce distrust from those used to build trust.
Citation
Saunders, M., Dietz, G., & Thornhill, A. (2014). Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?. Human Relations, 67(6), 639-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713500831
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Jul 16, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 3, 2014 |
Journal | Human Relations |
Print ISSN | 0018-7267 |
Electronic ISSN | 1741-282X |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 67 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 639-665 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713500831 |
Keywords | Card sort, Distrust, Mistrust, Mixed method, Organizational change, Trust, Trust levels. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1449818 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(363 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
The final definitive version of this article has been published in the journal Human Relations 67/I6 2014 © 2014 The Tavistock Institute by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Human Relations page: http://hum.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
You might also like
Organisational Trust: A Cultural Perspective
(2010)
Book
Preserving organizational trust during disruption
(2020)
Journal Article
Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: A case study
(2014)
Journal Article
The Dark Side of Trust: When Trust Becomes a 'Poisoned Chalice'
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search