N. Gillespie
Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: A case study
Gillespie, N.; Dietz, G.; Lockey, S.
Authors
G. Dietz
S. Lockey
Abstract
This paper presents a holistic, contextualised case study of reintegration and trust repair at a UK utilities firm in the wake of its fraud and data manipulation scandal. Drawing upon conceptual frameworks of reintegration and organizational trust repair, we analyze the decisions and actions taken by the company in its efforts to restore trust with its stakeholders. The analysis reveals seven themes on the merits of proposed approaches for reintegration after an integrity violation (including open investigations, accurate explanations, apologies, penance, and systemic reforms), and novel insights on the role of organizational identity, “changing of the guard” and cultural reforms alongside procedural modifications. The case further supports the dynamic nature of stakeholder salience across the reintegration process. The study both supports propositions from existing frameworks and suggests novel theoretical extensions for future research.
Citation
Gillespie, N., Dietz, G., & Lockey, S. (2014). Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation: A case study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 371-410. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014437
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Nov 19, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 19, 2014 |
Journal | Business Ethics Quarterly |
Print ISSN | 1052-150X |
Electronic ISSN | 2153-3326 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 24 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 371-410 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014437 |
Keywords | Reintegration, Trust repair, Case study, Organizational fraud, Stakeholders. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1441748 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(704 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© Copyright Society for Business Ethics 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Business Ethics Quarterly' (24: 03 (2014) 371-410) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BEQ
You might also like
Organisational Trust: A Cultural Perspective
(2010)
Book
Preserving organizational trust during disruption
(2020)
Journal Article
Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?
(2014)
Journal Article
The Dark Side of Trust: When Trust Becomes a 'Poisoned Chalice'
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search