Dr Nicola Reimann nicola.reimann@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
To risk or not to risk it: student (non-)engagement with seen examination questions
Reimann, N.
Authors
Abstract
This case study explores students’ perceptions of seen examination questions about topics not covered by the formal curriculum of a final‐year economics module and of the associated group support sessions. Eight semi‐structured interviews with a total of 13 students were analysed. Contrary to expectations, learners taking a strategic approach to the module were not attracted by the seen questions. The uncertainty of an unfamiliar assessment format and the prospect of undertaking independent research and group work were perceived as involving more risks than the familiar unseen examination. Take‐up for the seen examination questions was low, and the students who did not answer a seen question tended to make workload considerations as well as concerns about group work for assessment purposes responsible for their decision. Despite not participating in the group support sessions, a few students researched the seen question in conjunction with trusted fellow students or on their own. The students who answered a seen question enjoyed the autonomy which the seen exam questions provided, while other students were critical of the way in which their autonomy might be externally controlled. The study provides insight into the impact of assessment on risk taking and students’ perception of risk associated with this type of assessment.
Citation
Reimann, N. (2011). To risk or not to risk it: student (non-)engagement with seen examination questions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903311716
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Feb 4, 2010 |
Publication Date | 2011-05 |
Deposit Date | Jun 23, 2015 |
Journal | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education |
Print ISSN | 0260-2938 |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-297X |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 263-279 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903311716 |
You might also like
Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature
(2022)
Journal Article
Student mental health nurses’ understanding of recovery: a phenomenographic study
(2021)
Journal Article
What's in a word? Practices associated with 'feedforward' in higher education
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search