Professor Daniel Attenborough daniel.attenborough@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Empirical Insights into Corporate Contractarian Theory
Attenborough, D.
Authors
Abstract
In UK and US company law and corporate governance, a highly influential economic theory views the company, and the rules related thereto, as a nexus of contracts for organising business activity. This so-called contractarian theory of the company depicts fundamental corporate governance arrangements as a form of private ordering, in which rules are spontaneously produced in the absence of formal legal intervention. This paper draws upon broader empirical evidence of real world private ordering to make two essential arguments, which provide much-needed nuance to the idealised view of spontaneous governance found in the contractarian analysis. First, it emphasises the significance of a distinctive and essential correlative and causal connection between hierarchy and the development and nature of private orders. Secondly, it highlights the ways in which the state positively interacts with the purported self-regulatory capability of the market to produce these uneven endogenous rules.
Citation
Attenborough, D. (2017). Empirical Insights into Corporate Contractarian Theory. Legal Studies, 37(2), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12134
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 25, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 18, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Apr 28, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 18, 2018 |
Journal | Legal Studies |
Print ISSN | 0261-3875 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-121X |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 191-213 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12134 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1385932 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(401 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Attenborough, D. (2017) Empirical insights into corporate contractarian theory. Legal Studies, 37(2): 191-213, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12134. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
You might also like
The Political Legitimacy of Company Law and Regulation
(2020)
Journal Article
Misreading the Directors' Fiduciary Duty of Good Faith
(2019)
Journal Article
An Estoppel-Based Approach to Enforcing Corporate Environmental Responsibilities
(2016)
Journal Article
Review: Andrew Keay, Directors' Duties. Jordons, 2nd ed, 2014. 608pp. hb £130.
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search