Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Qualitative process study of community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention effectiveness trial: can research participation effects explain a null finding?

Quirk, A.; MacNeill, V.; Dhital, R.; Whittlesea, C.; Normal, I.; McCambridge, J.

Qualitative process study of community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention effectiveness trial: can research participation effects explain a null finding? Thumbnail


Authors

A. Quirk

V. MacNeill

R. Dhital

C. Whittlesea

I. Normal

J. McCambridge



Abstract

Aims This qualitative process study, nested within a randomised controlled trial evaluating community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention delivery, aims to explore participants’ engagement with the trial, so as to identify whether research participation effects may explain why the brief intervention was not found to be effective. Method Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 randomly selected participants approximately one month after the end of the trial. Semi structured Interviews were conducted by telephone in which participants were asked to give a chronological account of their trial participation, leading to a discussion of possible impacts. These were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the Framework method. Results A range of motivations for taking part in the trial were identified, including pharmacy visitors wanting to obtain an assessment of their drinking. Participants in both arms of the trial spoke of the potent effect that screening had on them. All participants were exposed to discussions about alcohol with empathic pharmacists and, as this is an integral intervention component, this constitutes contamination. Participants’ pre-existing ideas about the nature of alcohol problems had an important bearing on how relevant they thought the intervention was to them. Conclusion A detailed appreciation of participant engagement with the trial can provide a strong basis for interpretation of trial outcome data, and in this instance does help explain the null finding. Other findings also indicate the need for dedicated studies of public understanding of the nature of alcohol problems, and their implications for receptivity to brief interventions.

Citation

Quirk, A., MacNeill, V., Dhital, R., Whittlesea, C., Normal, I., & McCambridge, J. (2016). Qualitative process study of community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention effectiveness trial: can research participation effects explain a null finding?. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 161, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.023

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 10, 2016
Online Publication Date Feb 2, 2016
Publication Date Apr 1, 2016
Deposit Date Aug 2, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jul 17, 2018
Journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Print ISSN 0376-8716
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 161
Pages 36-41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.023
Related Public URLs https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/qualitative-process-study-of-community-pharmacist-brief-alcohol-intervention-effectiveness-trial(1e4cf600-aade-4a0e-bec2-20c2393d1e6a).html

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations