Dr Mike Adcock mike.adcock@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Dr Mike Adcock mike.adcock@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Professor Deryck Beyleveld deryck.beyleveld@durham.ac.uk
Professor
This paper presents a ‘concept-theoretic’ position on the relationship between law and morality in any legal system that includes respect for human rights as a fundamental principle of the legal validity of its rules. With European Union law (EU law) as its central focus, this concept-theoretic position is premised upon the adoption by the EU of fundamental principles, which include human rights. Therefore, given the current status of human rights within the EU, the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), and, indeed, any EU law hence any EU Intellectual Property law (IP law)must be consistent with what follows logically and conceptually from the concept of a human right given by the UDHR. The paper will first present the concepttheoretic framework with reference to EU patent law arguing that some requirements need to be read into EU patent law even when not expressly stated. Furthermore, with reference to Article 6 of Directive 1998/44/EC we argue that this provision must be interpreted broadly to give full effect to human rights and human dignity. The second part of the paper looks at the CJEU ruling in Brüstle v Greenpeace (Case C-34/10 2011) as viewed from the concept-theoretic position. We argue that the CJEU reasoning is substantially sound on the requirements of the Directive and the CJEU had no option but to make the rulings it did. The third part of the paper looks at several objections raised by scientist and lawyers regarding the CJEU decision in Brüstle from the concept-theoretic position. We conclude that the CJEU has not misinterpreted the law. Finally, we conclude that the law governing the grant of patents must be read in line with the concept of human rights and human dignity.
Adcock, M., & Beyleveld, D. (2016). Morality in Intellectual Property Law: A Concept-Theoretic Framework. Intellectual property rights. Open access, 4(1), Article 154. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4516.1000154
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 22, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 30, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Oct 25, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 25, 2017 |
Journal | Intellectual property rights : open access |
Electronic ISSN | 2375-4516 |
Publisher | OMICS Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 4 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 154 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4516.1000154 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1345641 |
Published Journal Article
(428 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Copyright: © 2016 Adcock M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Moral Interests, Privacy, and Medical Research
(2023)
Book Chapter
Morality and Intellectual Property Law Through the Lens of Human Rights
(2022)
Book Chapter
Is There Really Anything Wrong With an Absolute Principle?
(2020)
Book Chapter
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search