Professor Barend Van Leeuwen barend.j.van-leeuwen@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Euthanasia and the Ethics of Free Movement Law: The Principle of Recognition in the Internal Market
Van Leeuwen, Barend
Authors
Abstract
The free movement provisions enable EU citizens to follow their own ethical preferences by going to a Member State that has made a different ethical choice from their home Member State. However, UK citizens who have assisted suicide or euthanasia abroad could be criminally prosecuted on their return to England. This possibility of a criminal prosecution constitutes a restriction on free movement. Nevertheless, the free movement provisions have so far not been used to challenge the English prohibition of euthanasia. The aim of this article is to show that, based on its ultimate aim, free movement law does have a legitimate role to play in ethical issues. The internal market is based on a principle of recognition, which forces Member States to engage with regulatory choices made by other Member States. This also applies to ethical issues. Member States are not required to justify the existence of different ethical choices. However, if they decide to restrict free movement, they have to be able to show that these differences in fact exist. This approach achieves a balance between the right of citizens to make their own ethical choices, and the ability of Member States to protect their legislation on ethical issues.
Citation
Van Leeuwen, B. (2018). Euthanasia and the Ethics of Free Movement Law: The Principle of Recognition in the Internal Market. German law journal, 19(6), 1417-1436
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 4, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 30, 2018 |
Publication Date | Nov 30, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Apr 11, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 11, 2018 |
Journal | GERMAN LAW JOURNAL |
Electronic ISSN | 2071-8322 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 1417-1436 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1334350 |
Publisher URL | https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c05ba4421c67cd40173bd0e/1543879236505/5_Vol_19_No_06_Leeuwen_ET_Final.pdf |
Files
Published Journal Article
(254 Kb)
PDF
Accepted Journal Article
(603 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
First published in the German Law Journal, 30 November 2018, Vol. 19 No. 06.
You might also like
The Doctor in Free Movement Law: Expertise, Duty, and Accountability
(2023)
Journal Article
Harmonisation, European Standardisation and the New Approach
(2023)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search