J.G. Williams
The urban resource nexus: On the politics of relationality, water-energy infrastructure, and the fallacy of integration
Williams, J.G.; Bouzarivski, S.; Swyngedouw, E.
Authors
S. Bouzarivski
E. Swyngedouw
Abstract
The ‘resource nexus’ has emerged over the past decade as an important new paradigm of environmental governance, which emphasises the interconnections, tensions and synergies between sectors that have traditionally been managed separately. Nexus thinking presents itself as a radically new approach to integrated governance in response to interconnected socio-environmental challenges and constraints. This paper provides a critical review of nexus thinking. The nexus paradigm, we contend, is part of a broader trend towards integrated environmental governance where previously externalised ‘bad’ nature is increasingly internalised by capital. In general, the nexus discourse has become techno-managerial in style, linear in its analysis and reductionist in its recommendations. Focussing particularly on urban water and energy infrastructure as important political sites in the (re)configuration of resource connectivities, we advance two principal arguments. Firstly, that the current nexus thinking inadequately conceptualises the scalar politics of interconnections between resource sectors. Secondly, we challenge the currently pervasive focus on technological and institutional ‘solutions’, efficiency-oriented ecological modernist vision and the presentation of ‘integration’ as a panacea for unsustainable resource practices.
Citation
Williams, J., Bouzarivski, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2019). The urban resource nexus: On the politics of relationality, water-energy infrastructure, and the fallacy of integration. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(4), 652-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x18803370
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 21, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 8, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Sep 26, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 26, 2018 |
Journal | Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space |
Print ISSN | 2399-6544 |
Electronic ISSN | 2399-6552 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 652-669 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x18803370 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(193 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Accepted Journal Article
(620 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
You might also like
China's Belt and Road Initiative and the emerging geographies of global urbanisation
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search