Gabrielle Lynch
From peace campaigns to peaceocracy: elections, order and authority in Africa
Lynch, Gabrielle; Cheeseman, Nic; Willis, Justin
Abstract
Research on Kenya’s 2013 elections has suggested that a “peace narrative” was deliberately promoted by an establishment elite to delegitimize protest and justify the use of excessive force. It has also tended to see the Kenyan case as exceptional and to assume that such a narrative was only possible because of the 2007/2008 post-election violence. We agree that peace campaigns are often particularly intense in the wake of violence and that they can be manipulated to generate a “peaceocracy”, a system in which an emphasis on peace is used to prioritize stability and order to the detriment of democracy. However, by comparing Kenya to Ghana and Uganda, two countries that have had very different experiences of elections and election-related violence, we demonstrate that peace messaging is neither unique to countries that have experienced recent electoral conflict, nor a recent phenomenon. Instead, we highlight the pervasiveness of peace narratives across the sub-continent, which we show is due to a number of factors. These include but are not limited to the way that elections are used to assert and perform state autonomy and an associated ideal of elections as orderly processes; the capacity of multiple actors to instrumentalize the ideal of orderly elections; a popular fear of electoral violence even in countries where it is rare; a growing tendency to individualize responsibility for peace; and the availability of international funding. Taken together, these factors help to explain the rise of peace messaging. At the same time, we argue that the risk that this messaging will foster a “peaceocracy” varies markedly and that the likelihood of incumbent manipulation is greatest in countries with a recent history of civil conflict and where the quality of democracy is already low.
Citation
Lynch, G., Cheeseman, N., & Willis, J. (2019). From peace campaigns to peaceocracy: elections, order and authority in Africa. African Affairs, 118(473), 603-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adz019
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 20, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 22, 2019 |
Publication Date | Oct 31, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Dec 14, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 22, 2019 |
Journal | African Affairs |
Print ISSN | 0001-9909 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2621 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 118 |
Issue | 473 |
Pages | 603-627 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adz019 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1311568 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advance online version)
(243 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Advance online version © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. This is an Open
Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Saving, inheritance and future-making in 1940s Kenya
(2024)
Journal Article
Kenya's 2017 elections: winner-takes-all politics as usual?
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search