J.A. Okaily
Corporate governance quality and premature revenue recognition: evidence from the UK
Okaily, J.A.; Dixon, R.; Salama, A.
Abstract
Purpose Since 2005, wide-ranging concerns have been raised about misleading revenue recognition practices, especially during and after the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. There is a lack of research into the relationship between corporate governance (CG) mechanisms and premature revenue recognition (PRR). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a generalised least squares regression analysis of a sample of 854 FTSE 350 firm–year observations. Stubben (2010) discretionary revenue (DR) model is used to measure PRR as it is considered less biased, better specified and more likely to reduce measurement error than accrual models. Findings The results suggest that the size of audit committees plays an effective role in constraining PRR. Moreover, PRR is more likely to be curbed in the presence of small boards comprising a higher proportion of non-executive directors. Additional tests reveal that the relationship between board size and PRR is non-linear. Research limitations/implications The findings address the concerns of corporate firms, capital providers, UK regulators and standard-setters regarding misleading revenue recognition practices and should be considered while setting new governance reform recommendations in response to changing economic conditions. Originality/value This is the first study that adopts the DR model of Stubben (2010) to capture PRR and examines its association with CG internal mechanisms. Moreover, the paper considers an important time period – from 2005 to 2013 – in which many significant developments took place.
Citation
Okaily, J., Dixon, R., & Salama, A. (2019). Corporate governance quality and premature revenue recognition: evidence from the UK. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-02-2018-0047
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 11, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 2, 2019 |
Publication Date | Apr 2, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Jun 7, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 7, 2019 |
Journal | International Journal of Managerial Finance |
Print ISSN | 1743-9132 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 15 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 79-99 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-02-2018-0047 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1300159 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(416 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-02-2018-0047. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
You might also like
The relative valuation of cash flow and current accruals affected by their extremity
(2023)
Journal Article
Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators
(2021)
Journal Article
Audit data analytics of unregulated voluntary disclosures and auditing expectations gap
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search