Rosane Maria Seibert
Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators
Seibert, Rosane Maria; Macagnan, Clea Beatriz; Dixon, Robert
Abstract
This study aims to build a list of composite indicators by information that enable the assessment of philanthropic higher education organizations’ (PHEOs) social responsibility based on the interests of their stakeholders. A list of 88 social responsibility indicators was built based on a literature review and stakeholder interest to serve as a basis for the composite indicators. In order to identify and validate the indicators, field research was carried out. Stakeholders from Brazil and the United Kingdom scored them from one (not important) to five (very important) for each indicator identified in the literature review. With 540 valid answers, they suggested inclusions and exclusions according to their interests. Next, a correlation analysis was performed to identify and eliminate redundant indicators. The principal component analysis extracted the composite indicators. The results point to 11 principal components that are configured as composite indicators to evaluate the performance of PHEOs social responsibility considering the stakeholder’s interests, a factor that differentiates this research from the literature revision done. Some of the composite indicators are close to the social responsibility categories reviewed in the literature. However, others show more specific and in-depth interests, especially regarding the stakeholders themselves. These composite indicators help managers establish disclosure policies whenever they are focused on seeking legitimacy in the social context of PHEOs. It also contributes to the advancement of theoretical knowledge, presenting composite indicators, from the stakeholder’s perspective, for the disclosure of social responsibility of PHEOs
Citation
Seibert, R. M., Macagnan, C. B., & Dixon, R. (2021). Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators. Sustainability, 13(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031034
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 18, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 20, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021 |
Deposit Date | Oct 25, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 25, 2021 |
Journal | Sustainability |
Electronic ISSN | 2071-1050 |
Publisher | MDPI |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 3 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031034 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1230751 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(576 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
You might also like
The relative valuation of cash flow and current accruals affected by their extremity
(2023)
Journal Article
Audit data analytics of unregulated voluntary disclosures and auditing expectations gap
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search