Kong Fah Tee
Competing risks survival analysis of ruptured gas pipelines: A nonparametric predictive approach
Tee, Kong Fah; Pesinis, Konstantinos; Coolen-Maturi, Tahani
Abstract
Risk analysis based on historical failure data can form an integral part of the integrity management of oil and gas pipelines. The scarcity and lack of consistency in the information provided by major incident databases leads to non-specific results of the risk status of pipes under consideration. In order to evaluate pipeline failure rates, the rate of occurrence of failures is commonly adopted. This study aims to derive inductive inferences from the 179 reported ruptures of a set of onshore gas transmission pipelines, reported in the PHMSA database for the period from 2002 to 2014. Failure causes are grouped in an integrated manner and the impact of each group in the probability of rupture is examined. Towards this, nonparametric predictive inference (NPI) is employed for competing risks survival analysis. This method provides interval probabilities, also known as imprecise reliability, in that probabilities and survival functions are quantified via upper and lower bounds. The focus is on a future pipe component (segment) that ruptures due to a specific failure cause among a range of competing risks. The results can be used to examine and implement optimal maintenance strategies based on relative risk prioritization.
Citation
Tee, K. F., Pesinis, K., & Coolen-Maturi, T. (2019). Competing risks survival analysis of ruptured gas pipelines: A nonparametric predictive approach. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 175, Article 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.06.001
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 5, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 12, 2019 |
Publication Date | Aug 31, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 12, 2020 |
Journal | International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping |
Print ISSN | 0308-0161 |
Electronic ISSN | 1879-3541 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 175 |
Article Number | 103919 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.06.001 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1294643 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1.7 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2019 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Smoothed Bootstrap Methods for Hypothesis Testing
(2024)
Journal Article
Improving power calculations in educational trials
(2023)
Report
Smoothed bootstrap methods for bivariate data
(2023)
Journal Article
Discussion of signature‐based models of preventive maintenance
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search