Professor Peter Vickers peter.vickers@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Expecting the unexpected in the search for extraterrestrial life
Vickers, Peter
Authors
Abstract
On p. 10 of the 2018 National Academies Exoplanet Science Strategy document (NASEM 2018), ‘Expect the unexpected’ is described as a general principle of the exoplanet field. But for the next 150 pages, this principle is apparently forgotten, as strategy decisions are repeatedly put forward based on our expectations. This paper explores what exactly it might mean to ‘expect the unexpected’, and how this could possibly be achieved by the space science community. An analogy with financial investment strategies is considered, where a balanced portfolio of low/medium/high-risk investments is recommended. Whilst this kind of strategy would certainly be advisable in many scientific contexts (past and present), in certain contexts – especially exploratory science – a significant disanalogy needs to be factored in: financial investors cannot choose low-risk high-reward investments, but sometimes scientists can. The existence of low-risk high-impact projects in cutting-edge space science significantly reduces the warrant for investing in high-risk projects, at least in the short term. However, high-risk proposals need to be fairly judged alongside medium- and low-risk proposals, factoring in both the degree of possible reward and the expected cost of the project. Attitudes towards high-risk high-impact projects within NASA since 2009 are critically analysed.
Citation
Vickers, P. (2020). Expecting the unexpected in the search for extraterrestrial life. International Journal of Astrobiology, 19(6), 482-491. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1473550420000269
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 27, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 6, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-12 |
Deposit Date | Aug 31, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 6, 2021 |
Journal | International Journal of Astrobiology |
Print ISSN | 1473-5504 |
Electronic ISSN | 1475-3006 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 482-491 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/s1473550420000269 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1293903 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(759 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in International journal of astrobiology http://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550420000269. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © The Author(s), 2020.
You might also like
The Call for a New Definition of Biosignature.
(2023)
Journal Article
Don’t we all believe in scientific facts? Replies to my critics
(2023)
Journal Article
Breakthrough results in astrobiology: is ‘high risk’ research needed?
(2023)
Journal Article
Confidence of Life Detection: The Problem of Unconceived Alternatives
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search