Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Free Movement of Life? The Interaction Between the Best Interests Test and the Right to Freely Receive Services in Tafida Raqeeb

Van Leeuwen, Barend

Free Movement of Life? The Interaction Between the Best Interests Test and the Right to Freely Receive Services in Tafida Raqeeb Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

Comments on Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust (Admin) on whether parents had the right to take their child to Italy for continuing care after UK doctors recommended that treatment be withdrawn. Discusses the distinction between the best interests test and judicial review, and whether the hospital's refusal to transfer the child after a finding that it was in her best interests to be treated elsewhere breached her free movement rights.

Citation

Van Leeuwen, B. (2020). Free Movement of Life? The Interaction Between the Best Interests Test and the Right to Freely Receive Services in Tafida Raqeeb. Public Law, 398-408

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 2, 2019
Online Publication Date Dec 31, 2020
Publication Date Jul 31, 2020
Deposit Date Dec 2, 2019
Publicly Available Date Dec 20, 2019
Journal Public Law
Print ISSN 0033-3565
Publisher Sweet and Maxwell
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Issue 3
Pages 398-408
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1282394
Publisher URL https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=30791427&recordid=469

Files

Accepted Journal Article (203 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version Van Leeuwen, Barend (2020). Free Movement of Life? The Interaction Between the Best Interests Test and the Right to Freely Receive Services in Tafida Raqeeb. Public Law 398-408 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations