Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How to Conceptualise Energy Law and Policy for an Interdisciplinary Audience: the Case of Post-Brexit UK

Cairney, Paul; McHarg, Aileen; McEwen, Nicola; Turner, Karen

Authors

Paul Cairney

Nicola McEwen

Karen Turner



Abstract

Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.

Citation

Cairney, P., McHarg, A., McEwen, N., & Turner, K. (2019). How to Conceptualise Energy Law and Policy for an Interdisciplinary Audience: the Case of Post-Brexit UK. Energy Policy, 129, 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 7, 2019
Online Publication Date Feb 22, 2019
Publication Date 2019-06
Deposit Date Feb 26, 2020
Journal Energy Policy
Print ISSN 0301-4215
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 129
Pages 459-466
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.022
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1275792