Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Tories and the Language of 'Liberalism' in the 1820s

Craig, David

Tories and the Language of 'Liberalism' in the 1820s Thumbnail



This article reconsiders the problem of ‘liberal Toryism’ in the 1820s not by looking at the government’s policies, but instead at the very ‘liberal’ language through which they were expressed. It argues that an existing domestic language of ‘liberality’—which was associated with religious toleration and with freer trade—was quite distinct from the new political movements on the Continent. Canning and Huskisson used this well-established, and generally well-esteemed, language to enhance and extend their appeal to ‘public opinion’. However, many Tories were coming to view this terminology with increased suspicion in the aftermath of the Revolutions of 1820. The article stresses the way that the Tory press popularised a negative typology of the ‘liberal system’ which ran together religious, economic and foreign affairs, and depicted Canning and Huskisson as ‘theorists’ content to ruin the moral fibre and economic health of the nation in quest of an abstract metaphysics. By 1826 ‘liberal’ and ‘illiberal’ were increasingly seen as distinct positions that could not be bridged. Although Canning’s brief ministry was not able to bring about a reconfiguration of parties, the final years of decade saw a clear sense among many Tories that ‘liberalism’ was a powerful threat to traditional religious, political and economic practices.


Craig, D. (2020). Tories and the Language of 'Liberalism' in the 1820s. The English Historical Review, 135(576), 1195-1228.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 27, 2019
Online Publication Date Oct 24, 2020
Publication Date Oct 1, 2020
Deposit Date Mar 24, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 24, 2022
Journal English Historical Review
Print ISSN 0013-8266
Electronic ISSN 1477-4534
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 135
Issue 576
Pages 1195-1228


Accepted Journal Article (548 Kb)

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in English historical review following peer review. The version of record is available online at:

You might also like

Downloadable Citations