Debate: Decolonising Fascist Studies

Liburd, Liam; Jackson, Paul

Abstract

The drive to decolonise is of central importance to the study of fascism, which after all was and remains a politics rooted in specific conceptions of colonialism and race. In this article, we have invited both leading academics and early career scholars to reflect on how we might ‘decolonise’ fascist studies. Their comments approach fascism in a range of contexts, and offer reflections on how to frame future research questions, approach methodological issues, and consider how fascism studies might develop a more overt and clear stance on the problems posed by decolonising the subject area more broadly. It is hoped that these commentaries will enrich the field of fascist studies and, in turn, do more to relate it to the work of scholars in other relevant areas of study, particularly those working on critical theories of race and racism. Contributors to this debate are: Leslie James, Raul Carstocea, Daniel Hedinger, Liam J. Liburd, Cathy Bergin, Benjamin Bland, Evan Smith, Jonathan Hyslop, Benjamin Zachariah, and Caroline Campbell.

Citation

Liburd, L., & Jackson, P. (2021). Debate: Decolonising Fascist Studies. Fascism, 10(2), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116257-bja10039

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 27, 2021
• Online Publication Date: Nov 26, 2021
• Publication Date: 2021
• Deposit Date: Feb 9, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 10, 2022
• Journal: Fascism
• Print ISSN: 2211-6249
• Publisher: Brill Academic Publishers
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 323-345
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116257-bja10039
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1214196