Björn Holzhauer
Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHeffield ELicitation Framework extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study
Holzhauer, Björn; Hampson, Lisa V; Gosling, John Paul; Bornkamp, Björn; Kahn, Joseph; Lange, Markus R; Luo, Wen-Lin; Brindicci, Caterina; Lawrence, David; Ballerstedt, Steffen; others
Authors
Lisa V Hampson
Professor John Paul Gosling john-paul.gosling@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Björn Bornkamp
Joseph Kahn
Markus R Lange
Wen-Lin Luo
Caterina Brindicci
David Lawrence
Steffen Ballerstedt
others
Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies regularly need to make decisions about drug development programs based on the limited knowledge from early stage clinical trials. In this situation, eliciting the judgements of experts is an attractive approach for synthesising evidence on the unknown quantities of interest. When calculating the probability of success for a drug development program, multiple quantities of interest—such as the effect of a drug on different endpoints—should not be treated as unrelated. We discuss two approaches for establishing a multivariate distribution for several related quantities within the SHeffield ELicitation Framework (SHELF). The first approach elicits experts' judgements about a quantity of interest conditional on knowledge about another one. For the second approach, we first elicit marginal distributions for each quantity of interest. Then, for each pair of quantities, we elicit the concordance probability that both lie on the same side of their respective elicited medians. This allows us to specify a copula to obtain the joint distribution of the quantities of interest. We show how these approaches were used in an elicitation workshop that was performed to assess the probability of success of the registrational program of an asthma drug. The judgements of the experts, which were obtained prior to completion of the pivotal studies, were well aligned with the final trial results.
Citation
Holzhauer, B., Hampson, L. V., Gosling, J. P., Bornkamp, B., Kahn, J., Lange, M. R., Luo, W.-L., Brindicci, C., Lawrence, D., Ballerstedt, S., & others. (2022). Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHeffield ELicitation Framework extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 21(5), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2212
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 5, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 3, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022-09 |
Deposit Date | May 4, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 3, 2023 |
Journal | Pharmaceutical Statistics |
Print ISSN | 1539-1604 |
Electronic ISSN | 1539-1612 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 21 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 1005-1021 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2212 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1208056 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(782 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
A Bayesian Computer Model Analysis of Robust Bayesian Analyses
(2022)
Journal Article
Gaussian process modeling of heterogeneity and discontinuities using Voronoi tessellations
(2021)
Journal Article
Potential of ToxCast data in the safety assessment of food chemicals
(2020)
Journal Article
Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
(2020)
Journal Article
Generation of TD50 values for carcinogenicity study data
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search