Tzlil Shushan
Submaximal Fitness Tests in Team Sports: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Physiological State
Shushan, Tzlil; McLaren, Shaun J.; Buchheit, Martin; Scott, Tannath J.; Barrett, Steve; Lovell, Ric
Authors
Dr Shaun Mclaren shaun.j.mclaren@durham.ac.uk
Professor In Practice
Martin Buchheit
Tannath J. Scott
Steve Barrett
Ric Lovell
Abstract
Team-sports staff often administer non-exhaustive exercise assessments with a view to evaluating physiological state, to inform decision making on athlete management (e.g., future training or recovery). Submaximal fitness tests have become prominent in team-sports settings for observing responses to a standardized physical stimulus, likely because of their time-efficient nature, relative ease of administration, and physiological rationale. It is evident, however, that many variations of submaximal fitness test characteristics, response measures, and monitoring purposes exist. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a theoretical framework of submaximal fitness tests and a detailed summary of their use as proxy indicators of training effects in team sports. Using a review of the literature stemming from a systematic search strategy, we identified five distinct submaximal fitness test protocols characterized in their combinations of exercise regimen (continuous or intermittent) and the progression of exercise intensity (fixed, incremental, or variable). Heart rate-derived indices were the most studied outcome measures in submaximal fitness tests and included exercise (exercise heart rate) and recovery (heart rate recovery and vagal-related heart rate variability) responses. Despite the disparity between studies, these measures appear more relevant to detect positive chronic endurance-oriented training effects, whereas their role in detecting negative transient effects associated with variations in autonomic nervous system function is not yet clear. Subjective outcome measures such as ratings of perceived exertion were less common in team sports, but their potential utility when collected alongside objective measures (e.g., exercise heart rate) has been advocated. Mechanical outcome measures either included global positioning system-derived locomotor outputs such as distance covered, primarily during standardized training drills (e.g., small-sided games) to monitor exercise performance, or responses derived from inertial measurement units to make inferences about lower limb neuromuscular function. Whilst there is an emerging interest regarding the utility of these mechanical measures, their measurement properties and underpinning mechanisms are yet to be fully established. Here, we provide a deeper synthesis of the available literature, culminating with evidence-based practical recommendations and directions for future research.
Citation
Shushan, T., McLaren, S. J., Buchheit, M., Scott, T. J., Barrett, S., & Lovell, R. (2022). Submaximal Fitness Tests in Team Sports: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Physiological State. Sports Medicine, 52(11), 2605-2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01712-0
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 22, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 11, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2022-11 |
Deposit Date | Jul 28, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 9, 2023 |
Journal | Sports Medicine |
Print ISSN | 0112-1642 |
Electronic ISSN | 1179-2035 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 52 |
Issue | 11 |
Pages | 2605-2626 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01712-0 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1196693 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(3.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
You might also like
Understanding Training Load as Exposure and Dose
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search