Professor Mark Rubin mark.rubin@durham.ac.uk
Professor
An evaluation of four solutions to the forking paths problem: Adjusted alpha, preregistration, sensitivity analyses, and abandoning the Neyman-Pearson approach
Rubin, M.
Authors
Citation
Rubin, M. (2017). An evaluation of four solutions to the forking paths problem: Adjusted alpha, preregistration, sensitivity analyses, and abandoning the Neyman-Pearson approach. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000135
| Journal Article Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | 2017 |
| Deposit Date | Sep 5, 2022 |
| Journal | Review of General Psychology |
| Print ISSN | 1089-2680 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 321-329 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000135 |
You might also like
Type I Error Rates Are Not Usually Inflated
(2024)
Working Paper
Questionable Metascience Practices
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search