Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Outputs (8)

How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability (2007)
Journal Article
Feeney, A. (2007). How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability. Memory and Cognition, 35(7), 1830-1839

Two studies investigated participants' sensitivity to the amount and diversity of the evidence when reasoning inductively about categories. Both showed that participants are more sensitive to characteristics of the evidence for arguments with general... Read More about How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability.

Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children (2007)
Journal Article
Wilburn, C., & Feeney, A. (2008). Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children. Cognition, 106(3), 1451-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.018

In a recently published study, Sloutsky and Fisher [Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A.V. (2004a). When development and learning decrease memory: Evidence against category-based induction in children. Psychological Science, 15, 553–558; Sloutsky, V. M., &... Read More about Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children.

Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength (2005)
Journal Article
Heit, E., & Feeney, A. (2005). Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(2), 340-344

According to the diversity principle, diverse evidence is strong evidence. There has been considerable evidence that people respect this principle in inductive reasoning. However, exceptions may be particularly informative. Medin, Coley, Storms, and... Read More about Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength.

Deciding between accounts of the selection task: A reply to Oaksford (2002) (2003)
Journal Article
Feeney, A., Handley, S., & Kentridge, R. (2003). Deciding between accounts of the selection task: A reply to Oaksford (2002). Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, 56(6), 1079-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980245000034

In this paper we report on our attempts to fit the optimal data selection (ODS) model (Oaksford & Chater, 1994; Oaksford, Chater, & Larkin, 2000) to the selection task data reported in Feeney and Handley (2000) and Handley, Feeney, and Harper (2002).... Read More about Deciding between accounts of the selection task: A reply to Oaksford (2002).

Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task (2002)
Journal Article
Handley, S., Feeney, A., & Harper, C. (2002). Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 799-818. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000497

Three experiments examined the influence of a second rule on the pattern of card selections on Wason's selection task. In Experiment 1 participants received a version of the task with a single test rule or one of two versions of the task with the sam... Read More about Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task.