Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Law and governance in the Anthropocene (2022)
Journal Article
Woolley, O., & Harrington, C. (2022). Law and governance in the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 13(S3), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13168

This special issue on ‘Law and Governance in the Anthropocene’ brings together scholars from the disciplines of law and international relations to examine the ramifications of the Anthropocene for global governance and international law. The predomin... Read More about Law and governance in the Anthropocene.

Disadvantage, Disagreement, and Disability: Re-evaluating the Continuity Test (2021)
Journal Article
Begon, J. (2021). Disadvantage, Disagreement, and Disability: Re-evaluating the Continuity Test. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1972585

The suggestion that individuals should be considered disadvantaged, and consequently entitled to compensation, only if they consider themselves disadvantaged (Dworkin’s ‘continuity test’) is initially appealing. However, it also faces problems. First... Read More about Disadvantage, Disagreement, and Disability: Re-evaluating the Continuity Test.

Disability: a justice-based account (2020)
Journal Article
Begon, J. (2021). Disability: a justice-based account. Philosophical Studies, 178(3), 935-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01466-3

Most people have a clear sense of what they mean by disability, and have little trouble identifying conditions they consider disabling. Yet providing a clear and consistent definition of disability is far from straightforward. Standardly, disability... Read More about Disability: a justice-based account.

Disability, Rationality, and Justice: Disambiguating Adaptive Preferences (2018)
Book Chapter
Begon, J. (2018). Disability, Rationality, and Justice: Disambiguating Adaptive Preferences. In D. T. Wasserman, & A. Cureton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and disability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190622879.013.27

Is disability disadvantageous? Although many assume it is paradigmatically so, many disabled individuals disagree. Whom should we trust? On the one hand, pervasive mistrust of already underrepresented groups constitutes a serious epistemic injustice.... Read More about Disability, Rationality, and Justice: Disambiguating Adaptive Preferences.

Capabilities for All? From Capabilities to Function, to Capabilities to Control (2017)
Journal Article
Begon, J. (2017). Capabilities for All? From Capabilities to Function, to Capabilities to Control. Social Theory and Practice, 43(1), 154-179. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20174317

The capability approach aims to ensure that all individuals are able to form and pursue their own conception of the good, whilst the state remains neutral between them, and has done much to include oppressed and marginalized groups. Liberal neutralit... Read More about Capabilities for All? From Capabilities to Function, to Capabilities to Control.

Athletic Policy, Passive Well-Being: Defending Freedom in the Capability Approach (2015)
Journal Article
Begon, J. (2016). Athletic Policy, Passive Well-Being: Defending Freedom in the Capability Approach. Economics and Philosophy, 32(01), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267115000267

G.A. Cohen has criticized the capability approach for focusing on individuals’ freedom – their capability to control their lives – and ignoring benefits achieved passively. He argues that this view of well-being is excessively ‘athletic’. However, if... Read More about Athletic Policy, Passive Well-Being: Defending Freedom in the Capability Approach.

What are Adaptive Preferences? Exclusion and Disability in the Capability Approach (2014)
Journal Article
Begon, J. (2015). What are Adaptive Preferences? Exclusion and Disability in the Capability Approach. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12102

It is a longstanding problem for theorists of justice that many victims of injustice seem to prefer mistreatment, and perpetuate their own oppression. One possible response is to simply ignore such preferences as unreliable ‘adaptive preferences’. Ca... Read More about What are Adaptive Preferences? Exclusion and Disability in the Capability Approach.