Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Can International Law Limit Our Technological Imagination? On the Implications of the Customary Law Obligation of Prevention for SRM Governance

Sulyok, Katalin

Can International Law Limit Our Technological Imagination? On the Implications of the Customary Law Obligation of Prevention for SRM Governance Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

This article examines the role of customary international law in regulating SRM by analysing competing interpretations of the customary law principle of prevention and their implications for SRM governance. Existing customary law limitations are largely overlooked in current policy and expert discussions around the future of SRM, which seemingly proceed on the basis that there are no universally applicable limitations for states to develop SRM technologies should they decide so. The paper contrasts this view and argues, from a positivist point of view, that the customary principle of prevention does pose certain limits for states even before SRM-caused transboundary environmental harm occurs. It distinguishes between a retrospective and future-oriented dimension of the prevention principle, and it depicts three scenarios for how the prevention obligation may limit the development and deployment of SRM technology depending on how States (and international legal advisors) conceptualise the temporal scope and normative content of the prevention principle. The article also examines the implications of the different configurations of the customary law obligation for an eventual SRM treaty.

Citation

Sulyok, K. (online). Can International Law Limit Our Technological Imagination? On the Implications of the Customary Law Obligation of Prevention for SRM Governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation, https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.28

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 1, 2025
Online Publication Date May 15, 2025
Deposit Date May 20, 2025
Publicly Available Date May 20, 2025
Journal European Journal of Risk Regulation
Print ISSN 1867-299X
Electronic ISSN 2190-8249
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.28
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3955902

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations