Dr Michael Lengieza michael.l.lengieza@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Dr Michael Lengieza michael.l.lengieza@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Miles Richardson
Jack Hughes jack.p.hughes@durham.ac.uk
Career Development Fellow
Dr Michael Lengieza michael.l.lengieza@durham.ac.uk
Researcher
Jack Hughes jack.p.hughes@durham.ac.uk
Researcher
Landscape planning and design holds the potential to contribute to efforts toward repairing our growing psychological disconnection with nature. To do so, however, it is important to know what types of environmental features impact how connected to nature certain environments make us feel. The present study used a novel application of network analysis to identify which environmental features are most important for nature connection experiences. In this research, 205 participants completed online surveys in which they reported the presence or absence of a variety of environmental features during four previous nature connection experiences. They also indicated their level of recalled nature connectedness for each experience. The network analysis revealed that the most positively important features were those commonly found in rural nature (e.g., wild nature, animals, and mountains or hills). Features reflecting human presence (e.g., buildings, paved roads, vehicles) were most negatively important. Features commonly found in semi-rural nature (e.g., trees and meadows) were seemingly only important insofar as they were associated with the wilder features. Additionally, trails, wild nature, and mountains or hills were three of the features most central to nature connection experiences, suggesting that they are particularly important for how they support other parts of the network. Overall, from a purely nature-connection perspective, these findings support the need for increased rewilding efforts—more than simply increasing basic access to urban nature—and also limiting the overt presence of human development. Other more nuanced findings are also discussed.
Lengieza, M. L., Richardson, M., & Hughes, J. P. (2025). Feature networks: The environmental features that are central to nature- connectedness experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 259, Article 105362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105362
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 22, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 27, 2025 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Apr 4, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 4, 2025 |
Journal | Landscape and Urban Planning |
Print ISSN | 0169-2046 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-6062 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 259 |
Article Number | 105362 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105362 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3775222 |
Published Journal Article
(2.7 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Eudaimonic self-expansion: The effects of eudaimonic reflections on nature connectedness
(2024)
Journal Article
Nature as community: An overlooked predictor of pro-environmental intentions
(2023)
Journal Article
Ecotourism, eudaimonia, and sustainability insights
(2022)
Journal Article
The Paths to Connectedness: A Review of the Antecedents of Connectedness to Nature
(2021)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search