Ashley T. Simkins
Past conservation efforts reveal which actions lead to positive outcomes for species
Simkins, Ashley T.; Sutherland, William J.; Dicks, Lynn V.; Hilton-Taylor, Craig; Grace, Molly K.; Butchart, Stuart H. M.; Senior, Rebecca A.; Petrovan, Silviu O.
Authors
William J. Sutherland
Lynn V. Dicks
Craig Hilton-Taylor
Molly K. Grace
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Dr Rebecca Senior rebecca.senior@durham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Silviu O. Petrovan
Contributors
Uma Ramakrishnan
Editor
Abstract
Understanding the consequences of past conservation efforts is essential to inform the means of maintaining and restoring species. Data from the IUCN Red List for 67,217 animal species were reviewed and analyzed to determine (i) which conservation actions have been implemented for different species, (ii) which types of species have improved in status and (iii) which actions are likely to have driven the improvements. At least 51.8% (34,847) of assessed species have actions reported, mostly comprising protected areas (82.7%). Proportionately more actions were reported for tetrapods and warm-water reef-building corals, and fewer for fish, dragonflies and damselflies and crustaceans. Species at greater risk of extinction have a wider range of species-targeted actions reported compared with less threatened species, reflecting differences in documentation and conservation efforts. Six times more species have deteriorated than improved in status, as reflected in their IUCN Red List category. Almost all species that improved have conservation actions in place, and typically were previously at high risk of extinction, have smaller ranges and were less likely to be documented as threatened by hunting and habitat loss or degradation. Improvements in status were driven by a wide range of actions, especially reintroductions; for amphibians and birds, area management was also important. While conservation interventions have reduced the extinction risk of some of the most threatened species, in very few cases has full recovery been achieved. Scaling up the extent and intensity of conservation interventions, particularly landscape-scale actions that benefit broadly distributed species, is urgently needed to assist the recovery of biodiversity.
Citation
Simkins, A. T., Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Hilton-Taylor, C., Grace, M. K., Butchart, S. H. M., Senior, R. A., & Petrovan, S. O. (2025). Past conservation efforts reveal which actions lead to positive outcomes for species. PLoS Biology, 23(3), Article e3003051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003051
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 3, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 18, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025-03 |
Deposit Date | Apr 16, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 16, 2025 |
Journal | PLoS Biology |
Print ISSN | 1544-9173 |
Electronic ISSN | 1545-7885 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 23 |
Issue | 3 |
Article Number | e3003051 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003051 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3738564 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity
(2024)
Journal Article
Gaps and weaknesses in the global protected area network for safeguarding at-risk species
(2023)
Journal Article
Global patterns of climate change impacts on desert bird communities
(2023)
Journal Article
Wildlife trade targets colorful birds and threatens the aesthetic value of nature
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search