Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education

Perkins, Mike; Roe, Jasper; Vu, Binh H; Postma, Darius; Hickerson, Don; McGaughran, James; Khuat, Huy Q

Authors

Mike Perkins

Binh H Vu

Darius Postma

Don Hickerson

James McGaughran

Huy Q Khuat



Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of six major Generative AI (GenAI) text detectors when confronted with machine-generated content modified to evade detection (n = 805). We compare these detectors to assess their reliability in identifying AI-generated text in educational settings, where they are increasingly used to address academic integrity concerns. Results show significant reductions in detector accuracy (17.4%) when faced with simple techniques to manipulate the AI generated content. The varying performances of GenAI tools and detectors indicate they cannot currently be recommended for determining academic integrity violations due to accuracy limitations and the potential for false accusation which undermines inclusive and fair assessment practices. However, these tools may support learning and academic integrity when used non-punitively. This study aims to guide educators and institutions in the critical implementation of AI text detectors in higher education, highlighting the importance of exploring alternatives to maintain inclusivity in the face of emerging technologies.

Citation

Perkins, M., Roe, J., Vu, B. H., Postma, D., Hickerson, D., McGaughran, J., & Khuat, H. Q. (2024). Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 28, 2024
Online Publication Date Sep 9, 2024
Publication Date 2024
Deposit Date Jan 29, 2025
Journal International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Electronic ISSN 2365-9440
Publisher SpringerOpen
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 21
Article Number 53
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3355811