Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal

Shrestha, Parbati; Limbu, Aruna; Tiwari, Kusumlata; Chase, Liana E.

What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal Thumbnail


Authors

Parbati Shrestha

Aruna Limbu

Kusumlata Tiwari



Abstract

Lay counselling, or the delivery of talk-based therapeutic support by people without a clinical degree, is gaining popularity as a way of addressing global shortages of mental health professionals. In Nepal, lay counselors have made significant contributions to mental health and psychosocial care over the last two decades, particularly in the aftermath of major emergencies. However, research on the longer-term integration and sustainability of lay counselling interventions remains limited. This ethnographic study explored the meaning and importance of sustainability to different stakeholders in a lay counselling program implemented following Nepal's 2015 earthquake. We conducted participant observation in the everyday lives of five counsellors as well as four focus group discussions and 51 semi-structured interviews with counsellors and other key stakeholders. Our analysis revealed significant discrepancies in perceptions of sustainability; while organizations involved in implementing the program described it as a sustainability success due to continued government financing, counsellors emphasized their own and the government's failure to sustain high-quality service delivery in practice. Program-level barriers included inadequate budget and remuneration, lack of clinical supervision, and poor integration within existing systems. We also identified wider sociopolitical influences on sustainability, including the social positioning of counsellors, low understanding and acceptability of counselling, and a rapidly changing political landscape. These findings reveal the need for a critical approach to sustainability in global mental health, warning against superficial engagement that prioritizes continuity of government financing over quality of care and workers' rights. Advocating for an ecological orientation within sustainability research, we also discuss the importance of looking beyond program design factors to consider how local and national sociopolitical dynamics influence frontline service provision.

Citation

Shrestha, P., Limbu, A., Tiwari, K., & Chase, L. E. (2024). What matters for sustainable psychosocial interventions and who decides? Critical ethnography of a lay counselling program in Nepal. SSM Mental Health, 6, Article 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100359

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 23, 2024
Online Publication Date Oct 31, 2024
Publication Date 2024-12
Deposit Date Nov 26, 2024
Publicly Available Date Nov 26, 2024
Journal SSM - Mental Health
Print ISSN 2666-5603
Electronic ISSN 2666-5603
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Article Number 100359
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100359
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3107144

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations