There is no fresh air: A problem with the concept of echo chambers

Carey, Brian; Ventham, Elizabeth

Abstract

Standardly, echo chambers are thought to be structures that we should avoid. Agents should keep away from them, to be able to assess a fuller range of evidence and avoid having their confidence in that information manipulated. This paper argues against that standard view. Not only can echo chambers be neutral or good for us, but the existing definitions apply so widely that such chambers are unavoidable. We are all in large numbers of echo chambers at any time – they can be found not just on social media or in political groups, but in almost every social or epistemic group we could categorise ourselves into. Because we are finite and fallible, we cannot escape them and need to exist in them just to get by. The concept, then, does not actually capture something as structurally problematic as the paradigmatic cases would suggest. Our way of using the term in social epistemology needs to change.

Citation

Carey, B., & Ventham, E. (online). There is no fresh air: A problem with the concept of echo chambers. Episteme, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.43

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Aug 15, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Mar 4, 2025
• Deposit Date: Oct 29, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 6, 2025
• Journal: Episteme
• Print ISSN: 1742-3600
• Electronic ISSN: 1750-0117
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.43
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2992050