Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How Does Visibility Count? An Open Data‐Driven Approach to Compare the Use of Ground Visibility in Archaeological Field‐Walking Surveys in the Mediterranean Region

Strupler, Néhémie

How Does Visibility Count? An Open Data‐Driven Approach to Compare the Use of Ground Visibility in Archaeological Field‐Walking Surveys in the Mediterranean Region Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

There is a common agreement among archaeologists that assessing visibility in the field is essential to measure the accuracy of their observations. Archaeologists widely expect that low visibility negatively impacts the recovery rate of artefacts and sites during field‐walking surveys. However, they hold fundamentally divergent opinions on using recorded visibility values and on whether or how to weight the results. In this paper, I undertake a review and comparison of ground visibility assessments from three archaeological field‐walking surveys conducted in the eastern Mediterranean, all of which have published their data. Capitalizing on the availability of open data, I recode and analyse the algorithms employed in these surveys. The results highlight the impacts of weighting techniques, and I compare the maps produced with and without weighting. In all cases, the corrections do not substantially change the interpretations of the results at the scale of site identification. As such, this data‐driven experiment contributes to the ongoing debate on how to compare effectively and integrate data from various survey projects to study regional trends.

Citation

Strupler, N. (online). How Does Visibility Count? An Open Data‐Driven Approach to Compare the Use of Ground Visibility in Archaeological Field‐Walking Surveys in the Mediterranean Region. Archaeological Prospection, https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1964

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 14, 2024
Online Publication Date Oct 14, 2024
Deposit Date Oct 23, 2024
Publicly Available Date Oct 23, 2024
Journal Archaeological Prospection
Print ISSN 1075-2196
Electronic ISSN 1099-0763
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1964
Keywords cross‐comparison, survey method, site detection, archaeological survey, open data
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2972103

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations