Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real: a comment on Anderson et al. (2023) The Myth of Man the Hunter

Venkataraman, Vivek V.; Hoffman, Jordie; Farquharson, Kyle; Davis, Helen Elizabeth; Hagen, Edward H.; Hames, Raymond B.; Hewlett, Barry S.; Glowacki, Luke; Jang, Haneul; Kelly, Robert; Kramer, Karen; Lew-Levy, Sheina; Starkweather, Katie; Syme, Kristen; Stibbard-Hawkes, Duncan N.E.

Authors

Vivek V. Venkataraman

Jordie Hoffman

Kyle Farquharson

Helen Elizabeth Davis

Edward H. Hagen

Raymond B. Hames

Barry S. Hewlett

Luke Glowacki

Haneul Jang

Robert Kelly

Karen Kramer

Katie Starkweather

Kristen Syme



Abstract

Gendered divisions of labor are a feature of every known contemporary hunter-gatherer (forager) society. While gender roles are certainly flexible, and prominent and well-studied cases of female hunting do exist, it is more often men who hunt. A new study (Anderson et al., 2023) surveyed ethnographically known foragers and found that women hunt in 79% of foraging societies, with big-game hunting occurring in 33%. Based on this single type of labor, which is one among dozens performed in foraging societies, the authors question the existence of gendered division of labor altogether. As a diverse group of hunter-gatherer experts, we find that claims that foraging societies lack or have weak gendered divisions of labor are contradicted by empirical evidence. We conducted an in-depth examination of the data and methods of Anderson et al. (2023), finding evidence of sample selection bias and numerous coding errors undermining the paper's conclusions.
Anderson et al. (2023) have started a useful dialogue to ameliorate the potential misconception that women never hunt. However, their analysis does not contradict the wide body of empirical evidence for gendered divisions of labor in foraging societies. Furthermore, a myopic focus on hunting diminishes the value of contributions that take different forms and downplays the trade-offs foragers of both sexes routinely face. We caution against ethnographic revisionism that projects Westernized conceptions of labor and its value onto foraging societies.

Citation

Venkataraman, V. V., Hoffman, J., Farquharson, K., Davis, H. E., Hagen, E. H., Hames, R. B., Hewlett, B. S., Glowacki, L., Jang, H., Kelly, R., Kramer, K., Lew-Levy, S., Starkweather, K., Syme, K., & Stibbard-Hawkes, D. N. (2024). Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real: a comment on Anderson et al. (2023) The Myth of Man the Hunter. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45(4), 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.014

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 24, 2024
Online Publication Date Jun 29, 2024
Publication Date 2024-07
Deposit Date Aug 28, 2024
Journal Evolution and Human Behavior
Print ISSN 1090-5138
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 45
Issue 4
Pages 106586
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.014
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2772517
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real: a comment on Anderson et al. (2023) The Myth of Man the Hunter; Journal Title: Evolution and Human Behavior; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.014; Content Type: simple-article; Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.