Professor Nadia Siddiqui nadia.siddiqui@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Nadia Siddiqui nadia.siddiqui@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Vikki Boliver
Editor
Nadia Siddiqui
Editor
Financial incentives have been widely implemented for the improvement of participation and subsequent educational outcomes of disadvantaged and underrepresented students in education. This chapter presents an evaluation of a well-designed and carefully implemented university-led programme in which 7,669 students participated. In this group92 students also received a bursary of up to £2,000, who met the criteria of socioeconomic disadvantage according to their parental self-reported household income. The programme included opportunities for learning and a three years bursary plan for eligible participants. In the evaluation the comparison is drawn between applicants and those who were accepted for the programme. The evaluation outcomes were retention and degree outcomes. The results indicate some promise for programmes based on financial incentives such as bursaries, which are beneficial for disadvantaged students' degree completion outcomes, but not for being awarded a first-class degree. Prior attainment is a key predictor of both outcomes, and so is household income for those students reporting it. A very small number of students who received the programme are from ethnic minority heritage or have a disability. The degree completion outcomes of these disadvantaged groups are not always positive. Raising the degree completion rate of the disadvantaged students is the main target of widening access initiatives. Analysing existing data can be useful in studying patterns in HE populations. Unfortunately, the number of cases in one institution is generally so small (or the cell sizes for schemes and outcomes are so small) that such analyses may mislead. A national evaluation for all institutions and schemes would be far preferable.
Siddiqui, N. (2024). Do Supported Progression and Bursary Initiatives Improve Student Outcomes?. In V. Boliver, & N. Siddiqui (Eds.), Researching Social Inequalities in Higher Education: Access, Diversity and Inclusion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003452430-3
Online Publication Date | Sep 10, 2024 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Sep 10, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Aug 1, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 11, 2026 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Book Title | Researching Social Inequalities in Higher Education: Access, Diversity and Inclusion |
Chapter Number | 2 |
ISBN | 9781032589794 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003452430-3 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2681509 |
Reduce inequality within and among countries
This file is under embargo until Mar 11, 2026 due to copyright restrictions.
Quant Hub seminar: Fifteen years of Pupil Premium policy in England. What have we learned from Pupil Parent Matched Data (PPMD)?
(2025)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
What helps to attract minority ethnic teachers in England?: Results from a national survey
(2025)
Journal Article
Fifteen years of Pupil Premium policy in England
(2025)
Book Chapter
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search