Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A critique of the appeal to biology as justification for heterosexual relationship in the Church of England document Issues in Human Sexuality

Evans, Philippa

A critique of the appeal to biology as justification for heterosexual relationship in the Church of England document            Issues in Human Sexuality Thumbnail


Authors

Pippa Evans philippa.r.evans@durham.ac.uk
Part-Time Teacher



Abstract

The official position of the Church of England (CofE) regarding human sexuality affirms a heteronormative ideal of human relationship that finds fulfilment in marriage with an orientation towards procreation. Official publications by the CofE justify the male/female partnership in several ways, but it is the recurring appeal to human biology that is of interest in this paper. This paper will critique a natural law approach in which prescriptive statements are derived from biology to justify heterosexual relationships. This paper will pay attention to Issues in Human Sexuality (1991) because of the status afforded to it by the CofE; it was essentially used as an official statement on human sexuality; ordinands have been asked to abide by its theology; and because its theology is explicitly affirmed in subsequent CofE documents. Although Issues has been superseded and the CofE is in a new phase of debate, claims about biology remain.

Citation

Evans, P. (2024). A critique of the appeal to biology as justification for heterosexual relationship in the Church of England document Issues in Human Sexuality. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 24(2), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225x.2024.2328948

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 5, 2024
Online Publication Date Apr 5, 2024
Publication Date Apr 5, 2024
Deposit Date May 28, 2024
Publicly Available Date May 28, 2024
Journal International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church
Print ISSN 1474-225X
Electronic ISSN 1747-0234
Publisher Taylor and Francis Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 2
Pages 253-259
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225x.2024.2328948
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2466717

Files

Published Journal Article (634 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.


Published Journal Article (Advance Online Version) (631 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.





Downloadable Citations