Chao Han
Raters’ scoring process in assessment of interpreting: an empirical study based on eye tracking and retrospective verbalisation
Han, Chao; Zheng, Binghan; Xie, Mingqing; Chen, Shirong
Authors
Professor Binghan Zheng binghan.zheng@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Mingqing Xie mingqing.xie@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy
Shirong Chen
Abstract
Human raters’ assessment of interpreting is a complex process. Previous researchers have mainly relied on verbal reports to examine this process. To advance our understanding, we conducted an empirical study, collecting raters’ eye-movement and retrospection data in a computerised interpreting assessment in which three groups of raters (n = 35) used an analytic rubric to assess 12 English-to-Chinese consecutive interpretations. We examined how the raters interacted with the source text, the rating scale, and the audio player displayed on the computer screen when they were assessing. We found that a) the source text and the rating scale were competing for the raters’ visual attention, with the former attracting more attention than the latter across the rater groups; b) when the raters were consulting the rating scale, they fixated less frequently on the sub-scale of target language quality than the other two sub-scales; c) the rater groups did not seem to exhibit substantially discrepant gazing behaviours overall, although there emerged different eye-movement patterns concerning certain sub-scales; and d) the raters utilised an array of strategies and shortcuts to facilitate their assessment. We discuss these findings in relation to rater training and validation of score meaning for interpreting assessment.
Citation
Han, C., Zheng, B., Xie, M., & Chen, S. (2024). Raters’ scoring process in assessment of interpreting: an empirical study based on eye tracking and retrospective verbalisation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18(3), 400-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399x.2024.2326400
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 19, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 12, 2024 |
Publication Date | Mar 23, 2024 |
Deposit Date | May 28, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 28, 2024 |
Journal | The Interpreter and Translator Trainer |
Print ISSN | 1750-399X |
Electronic ISSN | 1757-0417 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 18 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 400-422 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399x.2024.2326400 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2466486 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advanced Online Version)
(4.8 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
You might also like
Working memory and interpreting studies
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search