Alexandra D. Buffry
Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species
Buffry, Alexandra D.; Currea, John P.; Franke-Gerth, Franziska A.; Palavalli-Nettimi, Ravindra; Bodey, Andrew J.; Rau, Christoph; Samadi, Nazanin; Gstöhl, Stefan J.; Schlepütz, Christian M.; McGregor, Alistair P.; Sumner-Rooney, Lauren; Theobald, Jamie; Kittelmann, Maike
Authors
John P. Currea
Franziska A. Franke-Gerth
Ravindra Palavalli-Nettimi
Andrew J. Bodey
Christoph Rau
Nazanin Samadi
Stefan J. Gstöhl
Christian M. Schlepütz
Professor Alistair McGregor alistair.mcgregor@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Lauren Sumner-Rooney
Jamie Theobald
Maike Kittelmann
Abstract
Background: Insects have evolved complex visual systems and display an astonishing range of adaptations for diverse ecological niches. Species of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup exhibit extensive intra- and interspecific differences in compound eye size. These differences provide an excellent opportunity to better understand variation in insect eye structure and the impact on vision. Here we further explored the difference in eye size between D. mauritiana and its sibling species D. simulans. Results: We confirmed that D. mauritiana have rapidly evolved larger eyes as a result of more and wider ommatidia than D. simulans since they recently diverged approximately 240,000 years ago. The functional impact of eye size, and specifically ommatidia size, is often only estimated based on the rigid surface morphology of the compound eye. Therefore, we used 3D synchrotron radiation tomography to measure optical parameters in 3D, predict optical capacity, and compare the modelled vision to in vivo optomotor responses. Our optical models predicted higher contrast sensitivity for D. mauritiana, which we verified by presenting sinusoidal gratings to tethered flies in a flight arena. Similarly, we confirmed the higher spatial acuity predicted for Drosophila simulans with smaller ommatidia and found evidence for higher temporal resolution. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that even subtle differences in ommatidia size between closely related Drosophila species can impact the vision of these insects. Therefore, further comparative studies of intra- and interspecific variation in eye morphology and the consequences for vision among other Drosophila species, other dipterans and other insects are needed to better understand compound eye structure–function and how the diversification of eye size, shape, and function has helped insects to adapt to the vast range of ecological niches.
Citation
Buffry, A. D., Currea, J. P., Franke-Gerth, F. A., Palavalli-Nettimi, R., Bodey, A. J., Rau, C., …Kittelmann, M. (2024). Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species. BMC Biology, 22(1), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 7, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 19, 2024 |
Publication Date | Mar 19, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Apr 16, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 16, 2024 |
Journal | BMC Biology |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 22 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 67 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7 |
Keywords | Ommatidia, Contrast, Acuity, Eye size, Optic lobe, Drosophila, Vision, Evolution, Field of view |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2346216 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(5.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
You might also like
Venom gland organogenesis in the common house spider
(2024)
Journal Article
Evolution of the Spider Homeobox Gene Repertoire by Tandem and Whole Genome Duplication
(2023)
Journal Article
Micromanagement of Drosophila Post-Embryonic Development by Hox Genes
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search