Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species

Buffry, Alexandra D.; Currea, John P.; Franke-Gerth, Franziska A.; Palavalli-Nettimi, Ravindra; Bodey, Andrew J.; Rau, Christoph; Samadi, Nazanin; Gstöhl, Stefan J.; Schlepütz, Christian M.; McGregor, Alistair P.; Sumner-Rooney, Lauren; Theobald, Jamie; Kittelmann, Maike

Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species Thumbnail


Authors

Alexandra D. Buffry

John P. Currea

Franziska A. Franke-Gerth

Ravindra Palavalli-Nettimi

Andrew J. Bodey

Christoph Rau

Nazanin Samadi

Stefan J. Gstöhl

Christian M. Schlepütz

Lauren Sumner-Rooney

Jamie Theobald

Maike Kittelmann



Abstract

Background: Insects have evolved complex visual systems and display an astonishing range of adaptations for diverse ecological niches. Species of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup exhibit extensive intra- and interspecific differences in compound eye size. These differences provide an excellent opportunity to better understand variation in insect eye structure and the impact on vision. Here we further explored the difference in eye size between D. mauritiana and its sibling species D. simulans. Results: We confirmed that D. mauritiana have rapidly evolved larger eyes as a result of more and wider ommatidia than D. simulans since they recently diverged approximately 240,000 years ago. The functional impact of eye size, and specifically ommatidia size, is often only estimated based on the rigid surface morphology of the compound eye. Therefore, we used 3D synchrotron radiation tomography to measure optical parameters in 3D, predict optical capacity, and compare the modelled vision to in vivo optomotor responses. Our optical models predicted higher contrast sensitivity for D. mauritiana, which we verified by presenting sinusoidal gratings to tethered flies in a flight arena. Similarly, we confirmed the higher spatial acuity predicted for Drosophila simulans with smaller ommatidia and found evidence for higher temporal resolution. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that even subtle differences in ommatidia size between closely related Drosophila species can impact the vision of these insects. Therefore, further comparative studies of intra- and interspecific variation in eye morphology and the consequences for vision among other Drosophila species, other dipterans and other insects are needed to better understand compound eye structure–function and how the diversification of eye size, shape, and function has helped insects to adapt to the vast range of ecological niches.

Citation

Buffry, A. D., Currea, J. P., Franke-Gerth, F. A., Palavalli-Nettimi, R., Bodey, A. J., Rau, C., …Kittelmann, M. (2024). Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species. BMC Biology, 22(1), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 7, 2024
Online Publication Date Mar 19, 2024
Publication Date Mar 19, 2024
Deposit Date Apr 16, 2024
Publicly Available Date Apr 16, 2024
Journal BMC Biology
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 1
Article Number 67
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7
Keywords Ommatidia, Contrast, Acuity, Eye size, Optic lobe, Drosophila, Vision, Evolution, Field of view
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2346216

Files

Published Journal Article (5.1 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations